1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006169012544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with advanced breast cancer responding to chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial

Abstract: The purpose of this randomized phase III trial was to study whether medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) maintenance treatment prolongs the time to progression in advanced breast cancer patients responding to an induction chemotherapy. Patients with progressive advanced breast cancer previously untreated with anthracylines and progestins were given epirubicin (30 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (2 g/m2) on days 1 and 8 at 3-weekly intervals. Patients without disease progression after 6 cycles of chemotherapy were randomly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, without a quantification of these effects, this clinical practice is hardly defensible as evidence based. The only prospective study available so far was conducted with medroxyprogesterone acetate in a mixed population of ER-positive and ER-negative patients [5]; two other studies have suggested benefit from maintenance hormone therapy after conventional [11] and high-dose chemotherapy [12], respectively, but their retrospective nature does not allow firm conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, without a quantification of these effects, this clinical practice is hardly defensible as evidence based. The only prospective study available so far was conducted with medroxyprogesterone acetate in a mixed population of ER-positive and ER-negative patients [5]; two other studies have suggested benefit from maintenance hormone therapy after conventional [11] and high-dose chemotherapy [12], respectively, but their retrospective nature does not allow firm conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy, however, has not been adequately explored so far. Only one prospective study has been published [5], where medroxyprogesterone acetate was administered as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy in a group of patients, which included premenopausal (48%) and estrogen-receptor (ER)-negative (39%) women. Despite these limitations, the study showed a significant, albeit modest improvement of TTP, from 3.7 months in the control group to 4.9 months in the medroxyprogesterone acetate group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in agreement with the results presented here, the role of Pg in the induction of apoptosis via induction of NOSII to increase NO levels was shown in ovarian cancer cells, 30 indicating a general function of Pg in this mechanism. In fact, several randomised studies and clinical trials have shown that treatment with progestogens led to significant though modest improvement of the relapse-free survival, 42,43 and that inclusion of progestogens in hormone replacement therapy reduces the risk of recurrence, which is associated with an increase in the apoptosis/proliferation ratio within the tumour. 44 The balance between cell death and cell proliferation determines tumour growth rate and even a small alteration in these parameters can be important for the expansion or regression of malignant tumours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another small study in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving conventional epirubicin therapy suggested a possible survival benefit from MET. 15 The only randomized trial assessing the role of MET in MBC patients has shown a modest improvement in PFS of MBC patients responding to six cycles of epirubicin and ifosfamide; 16 the administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate to 46 patients resulted in a PFS gain of 1.2 months Bone Marrow Transplantation compared to 44 patients in the control group. The small sample size, the inclusion of receptor-negative patients, and the use of an older generation endocrine compound limit the interpretation of this trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%