2005
DOI: 10.1159/000086976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance Hormone Therapy with Letrozole after First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer

Abstract: Objectives: Maintenance hormone therapy after first-line chemotherapy is routinely used by many clinicians in advanced breast cancer patients with potentially hormone-sensitive tumors, although there are insufficient evidences in the literature to support this practice. We investigated the effects of the third-generation aromatase inhibitor letrozole as a maintenance therapy in postmenopausal patients who had responded or had stable disease with first-line chemotherapy. Methods: Fifty-eight patients (median ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a relatively new perspective because maintenance with endocrine therapy after chemotherapy is a considerable treatment pattern especially when the expected benefit of continuous chemotherapy is limited or the toxicity is unbearable. A small number of previous studies supported this treatment pattern, but none of them mainly used Fulvestrant as a maintenance drug [33] . A retrospective study investigating the efficacy of maintenance hormone therapy showed that median PFS of maintenance hormone therapy was 14.4 months (95% CI: 11.6-17.3 months), but 98.5% of the enrolled patients received AI or SERMs as maintenance therapy instead of Fulvestrant [34] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is a relatively new perspective because maintenance with endocrine therapy after chemotherapy is a considerable treatment pattern especially when the expected benefit of continuous chemotherapy is limited or the toxicity is unbearable. A small number of previous studies supported this treatment pattern, but none of them mainly used Fulvestrant as a maintenance drug [33] . A retrospective study investigating the efficacy of maintenance hormone therapy showed that median PFS of maintenance hormone therapy was 14.4 months (95% CI: 11.6-17.3 months), but 98.5% of the enrolled patients received AI or SERMs as maintenance therapy instead of Fulvestrant [34] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For hormone receptor-positive patients, maintenance with endocrine therapy, such as tamoxifen, anastrazole, letrozole or exemestane, is preferred by a number of clinicians. Although available data is limited, a study by Bertelli et al (16), supports this approach. Letrozole provided a median TTP of 18.5 months in 58 postmenopausal patients who attained disease control with first-line chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to efficacy, the convenience and tolerability of the maintenance treatment must be considered; for example, intravenous chemotherapy requires frequent hospital visits for the patient, which are associated decreased quality of life for patients and increased healthcare worker costs. Therefore, the majority of patients prefer oral as opossed to intravenous chemotherapy ( 7 , 8 ), for example oral capecitabine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%