1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0021900200039188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance comparisons: block policies

Abstract: Complete repair and minimal repair models with a block maintenance policy are considered. Each of these models gives rise to a counting process, and these processes are compared stochastically. This contrasts with most previous work on maintenance policies where only univariate marginal comparisons were made. Also a more general block schedule is considered than is customary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these papers it was assumed that the distribution F is new better than used (NBU) or new worse than used (NWU). We assume that the distribution of the life time of the system F is either increasing failure rate (IFR) or decreasing failure rate (DFR) and show how the comparisons differ from those obtained by Block et al [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In these papers it was assumed that the distribution F is new better than used (NBU) or new worse than used (NWU). We assume that the distribution of the life time of the system F is either increasing failure rate (IFR) or decreasing failure rate (DFR) and show how the comparisons differ from those obtained by Block et al [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…To establish one of the stochastic ordering defined above, we construct a probability space with the processes * N N; * N N 0 ; such that the probability law of * N N and * N N 0 is as of N and N 0 ; respectively, and inequalities (1), (2) or (3) hold with probability 1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into account Definition 2.1 of Ebrahimi [6] and statement (c) in Theorem 3.1.1 of Block, Langberg, and Savits [3], assertion (i) then holds if and only if T 1 ¢ st T 2 . Hence, the proof follows from Theorem 2 above.…”
Section: (I) Under the Assumptions Of Theorem 2 One Has Mmentioning
confidence: 99%