2015
DOI: 10.1177/0264550514561776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining professional practice

Abstract: Probation officers 'sifted' to community rehabilitation companies (CRCs) are left wondering precisely what their role and longer term future will be; this article argues that they are essential carriers of the probation heritage in which they can be 'cultural architects 'to the CRC organizations. Being at one remove from the MOJ, the CRCs have the potential to reinvigorate 'what works'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restructuring of the probation service whilst creating CRCs led to the loss of a lot of experienced staff (Clare, 2015), making the need for group work more salient as well as saving money for the semi privatised companies (Bardens & Garton Grimwood, 2013). This may not be the best way for service users with ADHD to engage in probation work for several key reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restructuring of the probation service whilst creating CRCs led to the loss of a lot of experienced staff (Clare, 2015), making the need for group work more salient as well as saving money for the semi privatised companies (Bardens & Garton Grimwood, 2013). This may not be the best way for service users with ADHD to engage in probation work for several key reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%