2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mainstreaming LEADER Delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Abstract: The European Union (EU) Rural Development Regulations (RDR) provide the blueprint for EU rural development policy. A major change with the 2007-2013 funding period has been the decision to mainstream the LEADER programme as a cross-cutting axis for the local delivery of rural development. Delivery of the RDR in England (via the Rural Development Plan for England) has been devolved to the regions, and in the north-west there has been further sub-regional devolution. In Cumbria, where there is a history of succe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capacity building is also decisive for becoming selected for participating in the programme (see Shucksmith 2000). Furthermore, Convery et al . (2010) point to the relevance of the initial situation of a LAG for the development of its governance structures with respect to ‘who’ is involved and ‘why’.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacity building is also decisive for becoming selected for participating in the programme (see Shucksmith 2000). Furthermore, Convery et al . (2010) point to the relevance of the initial situation of a LAG for the development of its governance structures with respect to ‘who’ is involved and ‘why’.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) methodology as it secures and probes the meanings that participants assigned to their experiences (Convery, Soane, Dutson, & Shaw, 2010). The experiences and feelings of the participants were the main subject to be evaluated (Smith, Flowers, & Larkin, 2009).…”
Section: The Problem and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural partnerships within the program aim to build up the capacity of voluntary and community organizations which then become active in dealing with local problems; secure "co-finance" for local projects; attract voluntary contributions to the development process; and forge a stronger link between the state and excluded people, especially the unemployed and socially marginalized (e.g. Convery et al 2010;Lošták and Hudečková 2010;Maurel 2008;Furmankiewicz and Slee 2007;ÖIR 2003aÖIR , 2013bMoseley, Cherrett, and Cawley 2001). Independent evaluations of LEADER I, II and LEADER+ suggest that overall the program has been successful in supporting local development initiatives (Metis 2010;ÖIR 2003a;von Meyer et al 1999).…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%