Main Clinical Outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Complication Rates

Morimoto, Susana; Albanesi, Rafael Borges; Sesma, Newton; Agra, Carlos Martins; Braga, Mariana Minatel

doi:10.11607/ijp.4315

Cited by 142 publications

(141 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

120

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Compared to resin composite veneers, ceramic veneers are stronger and more durable, as they are less susceptible to wear, marginal fracture, discoloration, staining, and plaque accumulation 4‐6 . A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis of the clinical outcome of ceramic veneers showed that both feldspathic porcelain and glass‐ceramic laminate veneers have high survival rates 7 . Glass‐ceramic laminate veneers show a slightly higher survival rate than feldspathic porcelain veneers, 94% vs 87%, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Glass‐ceramic laminate veneers show a slightly higher survival rate than feldspathic porcelain veneers, 94% vs 87%, respectively. The complications reported were fracture/chipping (4%), debonding (2%), severe marginal discoloration (2%), endodontic problems (2%), and secondary caries (1%) 7 . A recent retrospective clinical study conducted in a university setting by two academic staff with a follow‐up of 20 years indicated that ceramic fracture was the main reason for failure of ceramic veneers 1 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of incisal preparation design on load‐to‐failure of ceramic veneers

Bennani

Aarts

Lyons

et al. 2020

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This in vitro study aims to evaluate load-to-failure of ceramic veneers with butt joint (BJ) and feathered edge (FE) incisal preparation designs, and to correlate these results to the failure mode of the restorations. Materials and methods:One hundred and forty-eight typodont teeth (customized Nissin A25A-UL19B) were divided into two different preparation configurations BJ and FE and two different loading angulations, 0 and 20 . Lithium disilicate ceramic veneers (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were milled using computer-aided-designand-computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques. Veneers were bonded to typodont teeth with resin cement (IPS Variolink Esthetic, Ivoclar Vivadent). Each group was loaded at the incisal edge using an Instron Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 0.01 mm/s till failure.Results: Pairwise comparison showed veneers from the BJ groups had a significantly higher load-to-failure value compared to the FE groups. Veneers with a FE preparation design loaded at 20 angulation had the lowest load-to-failure value.Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, both incisal preparation designs and loading angulations have significant effects on the load-to-failure values of ceramic veneers. BJ group exhibits a significantly higher load-to-failure value compared to the FE group.Clinical significance: BJ incisal preparation is preferred over FE preparation design. K E Y W O R D S butt joint, feathered edge, load-to-failure, preparation design, veneer preparation 1 | INTRODUCTION Ceramic veneers have become a popular treatment modality due to their conservative and esthetic nature and clinical performance. 1-3Compared to resin composite veneers, ceramic veneers are stronger and more durable, as they are less susceptible to wear, marginal fracture, discoloration, staining, and plaque accumulation. 4-6 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcome of ceramic veneers showed that both feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers have high survival rates. 7 Glass-ceramic laminate veneers show a slightly higher survival rate than feldspathic porcelain veneers, 94% vs 87%, respectively. The complications reported were fracture/chipping (4%), debonding (2%), severe marginal discoloration (2%), endodontic problems (2%), and secondary caries (1%). 7 A recent retrospective clinical study conducted in a university setting by two academic staff with a follow-up of 20 years indicated that ceramic fracture was the main reason for failure of ceramic veneers. 1 This finding is also supported by numerous earlier clinical studies. 3,8-16

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of incisal preparation design on load‐to‐failure of ceramic veneers

Bennani

Aarts

Lyons

et al. 2020

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Anyhow, the low µ values reflect the high sensitivity to defects of these materials and limit their use for locations under low stresses. Their use in ultrathin restorations where little to no preparation is required, advocated by some authors due to their highly esthetic characteristics, should also be seen with caution.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of pH variation on the subcritical crack growth parameters of glassy matrix ceramics

Melo

Pereira

Ramos

et al. 2019

Int J Applied Ceramic Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goals of our study were to calculate the subcritical crack growth (SCG) parameters of two veneering ceramics stored in water or Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) biofilm and remineralizing medium, with indentation flaws. Feldspar (VM7) and leucite-reinforced (VM13) glass ceramic disks (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) were made according to ISO 6872. Some specimens were indented with a Vickers diamond and the crack dimensions were measured. The specimens were fractured for a calculation of inert strength or further stored in water or submitted to pH variation, under preloading tension. Finally, the SCG parameters were calculated after the specimens were fractured under four stressing rates (MPa/s). Weibull analysis was conducted on non-indented specimens. XPS was performed as qualitative analysis. The subcritical crack of leucite ceramic did not vary with the media storage, but the glass-ceramic experienced a retarded growth after pH variation. The materials presented low Weibull modulus. Qualitative elemental analyses showed chemical modification on both ceramics. Therefore, the crack growth of leucite-reinforced ceramic was less affected by the environment pH than glass-ceramic. K E Y W O R D S aging, crack velocity, fatigue, glass-ceramics, subcritical crack growth How to cite this article: Melo RM, Pereira C, Ramos NC, et al. Effect of pH variation on the subcritical crack growth parameters of glassy matrix ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2019;16:2449-2456. https ://doi.

show abstract

“…A key factor of veneers is the ability to bond to the tooth substance, thereby reinforcing the strength. Etchable ceramics, which can be adhesively bonded to enamel includes feldspathic porcelain and glass ceramics, such as leucite enhanced or lithium disilicate based [2,3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel

Ågren¹,

Kou

Thorén

2019

Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of zirconia, stabilised with 5% yttria, luted to enamel and to evaluate the fracture pattern at loss of retention. Methods: A total of 53 test specimen were manufactured from two partially stabilised zirconia materials, Zirkonzahn Prettau Anterior (ZPA) (n ¼ 16) and Whitepeaks CopraSmile Symphony 5 layer (WCS) (n ¼ 18), and a lithium disilicate (Ivoclar e.Max Press) (n ¼ 19) acting as control. All test specimens were cemented to human enamel with Variolink Esthetic DC and then subjected to a shear bond strength test. Fracture and surface analysis were performed using light and scanning electron microscope. Results: No significant differences in shear bond strength were detected when analysing the three groups. Dividing them according to the fracture pattern significant difference in shear bond strength between the two zirconia groups could be seen analysing test bodies with failure of adhesion to the test body, but not to enamel. The ZPA had higher shear bond strength (23.68 MPa) than WCS (13.00 MPa). No significant differences were seen compared to the control group (19.02 MPa).Conclusion: Partially stabilised zirconia shows potential as a material to be used where macro mechanical bonding is not possible, although this study does not reveal how or if the bonding deteriorates over time. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Main Clinical Outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Complication Rates

Cited by 142 publications

References 12 publications

Effect of incisal preparation design on load‐to‐failure of ceramic veneers

Effect of incisal preparation design on load‐to‐failure of ceramic veneers

Effect of pH variation on the subcritical crack growth parameters of glassy matrix ceramics

Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About