2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetresonanzmikroskopie des Akkommodationsapparats

Abstract: Magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM) at ultra-high magnetic fields allows acquisition of high resolution MR images in the micrometre range. The use of ultra-high magnetic fields opens the possibility of user-independent and artefact-free detailed characterisation of the anatomical tissue of the human eye, which is not achievable with classical imaging techniques. This article correlates MRM of the anterior eye segment and the accommodative apparatus at 9.4 Tesla with conventional histology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound sound waves can partially pass through the pupil, but the technique has a lower resolution and is more invasive than optical coherence tomography. Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging avoids the distortions of the intervening media due to its physical properties (which are therefore difficult to accurately correct for) (Khan et al, 2018;Richdale et al, 2016; but this is of lower spatial and temporal resolution although higher tesla devices are becoming available (Stahnke et al, 2016). Direct accommodation assessment requires measurement of changes of the optics of the eye which can be achieved objectively through autorefractors (Win-Hall et al, 2010;Wolffsohn et al, 2011a) or aberrometers (Bhatt et al, 2013;Glasser et al, 2017;Perez-Merino et al, 2014).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound sound waves can partially pass through the pupil, but the technique has a lower resolution and is more invasive than optical coherence tomography. Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging avoids the distortions of the intervening media due to its physical properties (which are therefore difficult to accurately correct for) (Khan et al, 2018;Richdale et al, 2016; but this is of lower spatial and temporal resolution although higher tesla devices are becoming available (Stahnke et al, 2016). Direct accommodation assessment requires measurement of changes of the optics of the eye which can be achieved objectively through autorefractors (Win-Hall et al, 2010;Wolffsohn et al, 2011a) or aberrometers (Bhatt et al, 2013;Glasser et al, 2017;Perez-Merino et al, 2014).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRM enabled differentiation of the choroid, retina and sclera of the human eye ex vivo (Figure 6) 113 and supported ex vivo studies of the accommodation apparatus 114 . Ex vivo examinations of the human eye at 9.4 T permitted an in-plane spatial resolution of 32-50 µm 34,112 .…”
Section: Mreye Microscopymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Different layers of the lens, like the epithelium, lens capsule, cortex, or within the nucleus, are identifiable with micro-CT ( Figures 2B,3,4,6A ) ( 15 ). Micro-CT scans of moist lenses allow for more detailed imaging than MRI ( 11 , 33 ), while the risk of artificial damages is reduced compared to histological methods ( 11 ). Within the lens nucleus, IPI contrasting enabled further differentiation ( Figure 3 ) which resembles the results of Scheimpflug photography ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, section-based histology provides morphological ex vivo insights of higher magnification and resolution. The generation of spacious 3D visualizations based on histology, however, is time-consuming and vulnerable to artifacts resulting from sectioning (e.g., tissue compression; tissue damage, loss of alloplastic implant materials) which particularly concerns ocular samples ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%