2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetoelastic transition and magnetocaloric effect in induction melted Fe100−xRhx bulk alloys with x = 50, 51

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition temperature ( T t ) determined from the peak value of the d M /d T – T curve (inset of Figure a) in the heating process under a magnetic field of 2 T is 370 K. As the magnetic field increases, the transition temperature almost linearly moves to a lower temperature at a rate of 8 K/T (see Supporting Information S2). Thus, the phase transition temperature at the zero magnetic field can be determined to be 386 K by linear extrapolation, which is higher than that of monophase FeRh alloys with the same nominal composition in previous refs and . In addition, the full-width (∼11 K) at half-maximum of the d M /d T – T curve, as shown in the inset of Figure a, is larger than that in the literature, , indicating a broadened phase transition in FeRh alloys with second phases.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The transition temperature ( T t ) determined from the peak value of the d M /d T – T curve (inset of Figure a) in the heating process under a magnetic field of 2 T is 370 K. As the magnetic field increases, the transition temperature almost linearly moves to a lower temperature at a rate of 8 K/T (see Supporting Information S2). Thus, the phase transition temperature at the zero magnetic field can be determined to be 386 K by linear extrapolation, which is higher than that of monophase FeRh alloys with the same nominal composition in previous refs and . In addition, the full-width (∼11 K) at half-maximum of the d M /d T – T curve, as shown in the inset of Figure a, is larger than that in the literature, , indicating a broadened phase transition in FeRh alloys with second phases.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The calculation shows that in the PM phase the irradiated surface heats up only ∼1160 K, which would not explain the physical damage in the film. However, if the sample undergoes A1 PM-B2 PM phase transition (As we assumed earlier) the temperature can raise to ∼1800 K which is close to the melting point of this alloy (~1915 K [38]). In previous cases (S1, S2) the ablation could be easily explained by the vaporization of the material but, in this case (S3), the transferred energy does not support this mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Since synthesizing the FeRh single-phase samples is challengeable [37,44,45], a method of sample preparation using arc melting was developed, which makes it possible to minimize the phase with B1-type structure content in the sample. Alloys with the compositions of Fe 50 Rh 50 , Fe 50 Rh 47 Pd 3 and Fe 50 Rh 45 Pd 5 were synthesized by arc melting in an argon atmosphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%