2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetization reversal via a Stoner–Wohlfarth model with bi-dimensional angular distribution of easy axis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a magnetic monodomain with uniaxial anisotropy, the magnetization reversal canb be described using the Stoner–Wohlfarth model [2930]. Thus, if the field is applied along the easy axis (EA), the magnetization changes steeply its orientation along the EA at a switching field proportional to the anisotropy constant and inversely proportional to the spontaneous magnetization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a magnetic monodomain with uniaxial anisotropy, the magnetization reversal canb be described using the Stoner–Wohlfarth model [2930]. Thus, if the field is applied along the easy axis (EA), the magnetization changes steeply its orientation along the EA at a switching field proportional to the anisotropy constant and inversely proportional to the spontaneous magnetization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the aforementioned off-axis EH experimental result and micromagnetic simulations reveal that the shape anisotropy plays a decisive role in the distribution of magnetic moments in the CoCu/Cu MNW, which also means that the MR of individual MNWs is dominated by anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR). The value of AMR is first calculated using the Stoner–Wohlfarth model, , as shown in the Supporting Information S8. A 0.04% AMR value is obtained, which is much smaller than that of the experimental value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, previous results based on the SW model cannot explain the angle dependence of the switching field around 90° [35,36]. To overcome these limitations, the distribution of magnetization was considered on saturation magnetization and hysteresis loop [37,38]. However, the aforementioned problem with high angle has not been fully solved yet because a polar angle is solely considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%