2003
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2003-00207-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetism of nanocrystalline Finemet alloy: experiment and simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the alloys A (Finemet type) the beginning of the first crystallization step correlates with the increase of magnetization, as a fact that was well described, e.g. in recent papers [7,8]. The maximum of magnetization measured at 820 K for the first crystallization step as shown on Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For the alloys A (Finemet type) the beginning of the first crystallization step correlates with the increase of magnetization, as a fact that was well described, e.g. in recent papers [7,8]. The maximum of magnetization measured at 820 K for the first crystallization step as shown on Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The as-deposited film and the film annealed at 650 ℃ for 20 min show patterns with broad Bragg lines, centred at about 42° (in 2θ). In most alloys, such patterns are characteristic of a material structure made of small nanocrystals [23][24][25] with topological disorder [26,27] and dominant amorphous-like structure [28]. The broad Bragg lines observed in the patterns suggest the existence of a Cr-Al-C solid solution.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of the Sample A and B shows that the graphite can form protective coatings (shells), but the interface between Fe 3 C and graphite must be taken into account. This is documented by the broad region of the magnetic transition from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic state (smeared Curie point) and also by the additional component in the Mo¨ssbauer spectrum which is typically assigned to the iron atoms in interfacial regions [10,11]. The differences in saturation magnetization can be ascribed to the substantially larger volume fraction of the second phase (graphite) in the Sample B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%