2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gc009745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Surveys With Unmanned Aerial Systems: Software for Assessing and Comparing the Accuracy of Different Sensor Systems, Suspension Designs and Compensation Methods

Abstract: Magnetic surveys have a wide range of applications in the geosciences, including the mitigation of earthquake and volcano hazard assessments (e.g.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides magnetic field measurements that can resolve very small temporal changes (<10 nT). This is higher than common aeromagnetic survey using both fluxgate and scalar magnetometers that usually provide accuracy lower than 2 nT [Coyle et al 2014;Gavazzi et al 2019;Kaub et al 2021].…”
Section: Uav Sensors and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It provides magnetic field measurements that can resolve very small temporal changes (<10 nT). This is higher than common aeromagnetic survey using both fluxgate and scalar magnetometers that usually provide accuracy lower than 2 nT [Coyle et al 2014;Gavazzi et al 2019;Kaub et al 2021].…”
Section: Uav Sensors and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…One common approach to mitigating these interfering local fields is to deploy the magnetometer arrays far from the UAV via a system of tethers. However, these tethers can cause additional complications when the UAV must traverse complex terrain or fly at low altitudes, and as a result more complex interference mitigation techniques must be utilized (Kaub et al, 2021). These complications are not limited to low-altitude unmanned aerial surveys, but also apply to higher-altitude manned aeromagnetic 240 surveying (Tuck et al, 2021).…”
Section: Level 2b -Cdf Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 ] Various sensing technology solutions have been developed to monitor the health status of the aircraft, [ 6 ] including differential pressure sensing technology, [ 7 ] fiber optic sensing technology, [ 8 ] capacitive sensing technology, [ 9 ] and electromagnetic sensing technology. [ 10 ] However, these existing technologies have limitations such as complexity, [ 11 ] large size, [ 12 ] high cost, [ 13 ] susceptibility to external interference, [ 5b ] and the need for an external power supply, [ 14 ] making them challenging to integrate into VS condition monitoring applications. Therefore, new approaches are necessary to address these challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%