2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic stray field measurements to identify and localise impact-induced plastic deformation in a steel structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For specimens B1 and B2, which have a considerably higher F max than the other specimens, a larger region of plastic deformation is formed around the crack. As plastic strain reduces the magnetic properties of the material [10], the remanent magnetic field is lower, resulting in a lower change of the mean magnetic field for these two specimens.…”
Section: Mean Of the Magnetic Signalmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For specimens B1 and B2, which have a considerably higher F max than the other specimens, a larger region of plastic deformation is formed around the crack. As plastic strain reduces the magnetic properties of the material [10], the remanent magnetic field is lower, resulting in a lower change of the mean magnetic field for these two specimens.…”
Section: Mean Of the Magnetic Signalmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the magnetisation is (not exclusively) influenced by the stress and the amount of plastic deformation, the mean magnetic stray field B reflects the current and past stress state of the material. A change of the mean magnetic field B with increasing crack length is measured in the following three situations [10]:…”
Section: Mean Of the Magnetic Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%