2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Stimulation of Extrastriate Body Area Impairs Visual Processing of Nonfacial Body Parts

Abstract: Functional magnetic resonance imaging indicates that observation of the human body induces a selective activation of a lateral occipitotemporal cortical area called extrastriate body area (EBA). This area is responsive to static and moving images of the human body and parts of it, but it is insensitive to faces and stimulus categories unrelated to the human body. With event-related repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, we tested the possible causal relation between neural activity in EBA and visual pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
127
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
13
127
2
Order By: Relevance
“…showing that EBA-rTMS impairs visual body discrimination (Urgesi et al, 2004;Urgesi, Candidi et al, 2007;Urgesi, Calvo-Merino et al, 2007;Pitcher et al, 2009). However, EBArTMS seems to affect selectively the local processing of body parts details, as shown, for example, by the finding that it interferes with matching inverted bodies, which can be discriminated only using local processing, but not with matching upright whole body figures, which can be discriminated using also configural processing (Urgesi, Candidi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…showing that EBA-rTMS impairs visual body discrimination (Urgesi et al, 2004;Urgesi, Candidi et al, 2007;Urgesi, Calvo-Merino et al, 2007;Pitcher et al, 2009). However, EBArTMS seems to affect selectively the local processing of body parts details, as shown, for example, by the finding that it interferes with matching inverted bodies, which can be discriminated only using local processing, but not with matching upright whole body figures, which can be discriminated using also configural processing (Urgesi, Candidi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, while uncovering the body of opposite-gender models strongly increased the affective and attractiveness ratings of men, a much less increment was obtained in women during observation of nude vs. clothed male bodies (Costa et al, 2003). Since EBA is specifically involved in processing the form of non-facial body parts (Peelen & Downing, 2007;Urgesi et al, 2004), its alteration following rTMS may reduce the impact of body form cues on the esthetic appreciation given by men to female bodies and, therefore, reduce their final esthetic appreciation. In contrast, the same alteration in women might reduce the impact of body form processing in judging the esthetic appearance of male bodies, thus leading to an overall increase of esthetic judgments based on other cues (e.g., body implied motion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, self-produced movements of the limbs activate EBA 6 , suggesting a functional link between body visual representations and the action observation-execution matching systems 7 . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of EBA interferes with the processing of static images of human bodies 8 . However, the specific functional contributions of EBA and of the motor mirror system in the processing of bodily actions are still debated 1,9,10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%