2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed to be used in pregnant patients with abdominal pain when US is inconclusive [33]. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis was published [34].…”
Section: What Are the Optimal Methods In Diagnosing Iai That Balancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed to be used in pregnant patients with abdominal pain when US is inconclusive [33]. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis was published [34].…”
Section: What Are the Optimal Methods In Diagnosing Iai That Balancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Although US is the most commonly and easily performed diagnostic tool for AA in pregnancy, recently magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be superior, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 96.8% and 99.2% respectively. [7,8] Since most of the signs of appendicitis are also found during normal pregnancy period, decisions about surgery become more difficult with these patients. Surgery is unavoidable, but there are stıll questions about which technique to be used for appendectomy, laparoscopic or open surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic accuracy is at maximum level and can differentiate from other sources of pain that are common findings in pregnancy, such as: gastro-intestinal, hepatobiliary, gynecologic or urinary origin pain (18,19) In the present study all markers used were obtained early at admission, following clinical examination in the emergency clinic, with conservative management being thereafter decided. No patient had signs of perforation, although many complicated cases with phlegmon or abscess can treated conservatively, with excellent outcomes (20), despite surgery remaining the main treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%