1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.42.8752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic pair-breaking effects: Moment formation and critical doping level in superconductingLa1.85Sr0.15

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

18
202
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
18
202
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Anderson's theorem, conventional isotropic s−wave superconductors are not affected by the potential (non-magnetic) scattering, but are sensitive to a spin -flip scattering on magnetic impurities [1]. In high−T c cuprates, both magnetic and non-magnetic impurities were found to cause a rapid suppression of the superconducting transition temperature, T c , strongly supporting d−wave pairing [9]. For an order parameter changing sign between the sheets of the Fermi surface (s ± symmetry), considered the most plausible pairing state in multi-band iron-based superconductors (FeSCs) [10][11][12], the response to non-magnetic scattering is expected to be significant and formally similar to the magnetic scattering in single band s−wave superconductors [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Anderson's theorem, conventional isotropic s−wave superconductors are not affected by the potential (non-magnetic) scattering, but are sensitive to a spin -flip scattering on magnetic impurities [1]. In high−T c cuprates, both magnetic and non-magnetic impurities were found to cause a rapid suppression of the superconducting transition temperature, T c , strongly supporting d−wave pairing [9]. For an order parameter changing sign between the sheets of the Fermi surface (s ± symmetry), considered the most plausible pairing state in multi-band iron-based superconductors (FeSCs) [10][11][12], the response to non-magnetic scattering is expected to be significant and formally similar to the magnetic scattering in single band s−wave superconductors [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these selected films superconductivity persists to y c = 0.055, while for larger resistivities T c vanishes earlier. In ceramic specimens y c = 0.03 [8].The increase in the residual resistivity, ∆ρ 0 , as a function of y is shown in the inset in Fig. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these selected films superconductivity persists to y c = 0.055, while for larger resistivities T c vanishes earlier. In ceramic specimens y c = 0.03 [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small amount of Zn substituted for Cu is known to appreciably reduce the superconducting transition temperature. 9 Magnetic susceptibility data 9 for La 1.85 Sr 0.15 Cu 1−x Zn x O 4 and NMR data 10 for YBa 2 (Cu 1−x Zn x ) 3 O 7−δ provided evidences that Zn induces magnetic moments in the CuO 2 plane. However, not much attention has been paid to the effect of nonmagnetic impurities on optical conductivity of the cuprates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%