2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic imaging and electrical resistivity tomography studies in a Roman military installation found in Satala archaeological site, northeastern Anatolia, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus chose to use the WennerSchlumberger array, which is optimal for disturbed surface conditions. This configuration has a good signal-to-noise ratio, but synthetic modelling studies have shown that the spatial resolution of this configuration is relatively poor (compared to, for example dipoleedipole, Schlumberger, half-Wenner and pole-dipole) (Dahlin and Zhou, 2004;Drahor et al, 2008a). During data acquisition, the distances between the potential electrodes were 1, 2 and 3 m, and the "n" factor was varied between 1 and 6.…”
Section: Outdoor Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We thus chose to use the WennerSchlumberger array, which is optimal for disturbed surface conditions. This configuration has a good signal-to-noise ratio, but synthetic modelling studies have shown that the spatial resolution of this configuration is relatively poor (compared to, for example dipoleedipole, Schlumberger, half-Wenner and pole-dipole) (Dahlin and Zhou, 2004;Drahor et al, 2008a). During data acquisition, the distances between the potential electrodes were 1, 2 and 3 m, and the "n" factor was varied between 1 and 6.…”
Section: Outdoor Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and resistivity profiling have been widely used in archaeology (Drahor et al, 2005(Drahor et al, , 2008a(Drahor et al, , 2008bDrahor, 2006;Papadopoulos et al, 2006;Astin et al, 2007;Casana et al, 2008, Tsokas et al, 2008. ERT yields more information than conventional resistivity mapping or imaging about depth, true resistivity and the extent of buried archaeological structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) can be used to trace caves (e.g., Chamberlain et al, 2000;Gibson et al, 2004;ElQady et al, 2005;Valois et al, 2010;Gosar & Čeru, 2016), search for discontinuities in limestone rocks and determine soil depth in buried karst terrains (e.g., Zhou et al, 2000;Harvitch & Valenta, 2011;Hamdan et al, 2012) and determine soil thickness in archaeological sites (see e.g., Griffiths & Barker, 1994;Drahor et al, 2008), mines and caves (Kauffman, 2002). Seismic methods can be used for geological mapping and estimating the depth of soft cover layers (e. Giocoli et al, 2015) and for the detection of caves (e.g., Surányi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is published work on geophysical surveys at Roman forts (Biggins et al, 1999;Biggins and Taylor, 2004;Hopewell et al, 2005;Drahor et al, 2008;Gaffney and Gater, 2003), but none we are aware of on temporary military camps. This paper discusses results of field magnetometry at Septimer Pass, and the complementarity of these geophysical results with the earlier archaeological excavation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%