2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae97a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Helicity Reversal in the Corona at Small Plasma Beta

Abstract: Solar and stellar dynamos shed small-scale and large-scale magnetic helicity of opposite signs. However, solar wind observations and simulations have shown that some distance above the dynamo both the smallscale and large-scale magnetic helicities have reversed signs. With realistic simulations of the solar corona above an active region now being available, we have access to the magnetic field and current density along coronal loops. We show that a sign reversal in the horizontal averages of the magnetic helic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, as we are mostly interested in the scaling of magnetic helicity to X-ray emission, the gauge will not affect our results. Furthermore, the work of Bourdin et al (2018) have shown that calculating magnetic helicity density using the resistive gauge, the magnetic helicity spectrum and the relative helicity by Berger & Field (1984) give consistent results for a simulation of the solar corona, very similar to the ones used in our work. We are therefore convinced that calculation of magnetic helicity in our gauge is meaningful and we can use the observed values of magnetic helicity (Zhang et al 2014(Zhang et al , 2016 as an motivation to our photospheric helicity injection.…”
Section: Magnetic Helicity and Its Gaugesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, as we are mostly interested in the scaling of magnetic helicity to X-ray emission, the gauge will not affect our results. Furthermore, the work of Bourdin et al (2018) have shown that calculating magnetic helicity density using the resistive gauge, the magnetic helicity spectrum and the relative helicity by Berger & Field (1984) give consistent results for a simulation of the solar corona, very similar to the ones used in our work. We are therefore convinced that calculation of magnetic helicity in our gauge is meaningful and we can use the observed values of magnetic helicity (Zhang et al 2014(Zhang et al , 2016 as an motivation to our photospheric helicity injection.…”
Section: Magnetic Helicity and Its Gaugesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Nindos et al 2003;Pariat et al 2017). Furthermore, there are indication that magnetic helicity also plays an important role the heating in coronal loops (Warnecke et al 2017;Bourdin et al 2018). However, how the coronal heating scales with magnetic helicity have not been studied so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, however, the sign reversal occurs near the point where the plasma is unity, as now predicted by Bourdin et al. (2018), we would need to measure even closer to the surface. This requires remote sensing via polarimetry.…”
Section: The Solar Dynamomentioning
confidence: 86%
“…NASA's Parker Solar Probe mission will have a magnetometer on board as well and will be able to approach the Sun to within 0.04 AU = 6000 Mm. If, however, the sign reversal occurs near the point where the plasma beta is unity, as now predicted by Bourdin et al (2018), we would need to measure even closer to the surface. This requires remote sensing via polarimetry.…”
Section: Magnetic Helicity In the Solar Windmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation