2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3238062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic force microscopy investigation of the static magnetic domain structure and domain rotation in Fe-x at. %Ga alloys

Abstract: ; et al., "Magnetic force microscopy investigation of the static magnetic domain structure and domain rotation in Fe-x at. %Ga alloys," Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 152511 (2009); http://dx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows typical magnetic domain patterns of all three samples. These patterns are similar to the maze domain patterns reported by Bai et al [1,2], Zhou et al [19] and Song et al [20]. Contrary to the reported correlation between the domain size and the sample composition [1,2], it was found that domain patterns vary in size and structure within the same sample.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 shows typical magnetic domain patterns of all three samples. These patterns are similar to the maze domain patterns reported by Bai et al [1,2], Zhou et al [19] and Song et al [20]. Contrary to the reported correlation between the domain size and the sample composition [1,2], it was found that domain patterns vary in size and structure within the same sample.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…out-of-plane anisotropy. Contrary to the belief that this anisotropy is due to the presence of nanoscale heterogeneities [1,2] (Bai et al, 2005(Bai et al, , 2009), we show that it is due to a damaged surface layer caused by standard mechanical polishing. The surface conditions in Fe-Ga alloys are more sensitive to stress-induced damage than in pure a-Fe.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations