1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.3532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Field Induced Transitions from Spin Glass to Liquid to Long Range Order in a 3D Geometrically Frustrated Magnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides an estimate for exchange anisotropy of 0:1 meV [33], which could lead to an Ising transition at sufficiently low T. Alternatively nuclear spins and phonons which are effectively decoupled from magnetism at high T and normally unimportant compared to exchange interactions at low T may become relevant close to the field tuned QCP. Similar low T anomalies have been found in other electronic spin systems close to quantum criticality such as GGG [34], LiHoF 4 [10], and ZnCr 2 O 4 [35]. In LiHoF 4 , the anomaly favors the spin ordered phase and is associated with hyperfine coupling to the nuclear spin system.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…This provides an estimate for exchange anisotropy of 0:1 meV [33], which could lead to an Ising transition at sufficiently low T. Alternatively nuclear spins and phonons which are effectively decoupled from magnetism at high T and normally unimportant compared to exchange interactions at low T may become relevant close to the field tuned QCP. Similar low T anomalies have been found in other electronic spin systems close to quantum criticality such as GGG [34], LiHoF 4 [10], and ZnCr 2 O 4 [35]. In LiHoF 4 , the anomaly favors the spin ordered phase and is associated with hyperfine coupling to the nuclear spin system.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…(GGG), showing a broad peak at higher temperatures, which was found to correspond to the quenching of local antiferromagnetic correlations [7]. The two peaks which evolve at lower temperatures are also reminiscent of the (much sharper) peaks associated with field-induced long range order in that material [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(GGG), showing a broad peak at higher temperatures, which was found to correspond to the quenching of local antiferromagnetic correlations [7]. The two peaks which evolve at lower temperatures are also reminiscent of the (much sharper) peaks associated with field-induced long range order in that material [9].Since the susceptibility is so similar in the Ho and Dy SSI materials, the question arises of why the entropy is so different, i.e., why there is no measurable macroscopic zero point entropy in the Dy material. A possible explanation is that the dissimilarity in the entropy data arises from the differences in the structural domains of local pyrochlore order.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, metamagnetic behaviour has also been reported in some of the well known multiferroic systems such as BiFeO 3 and phase separated multiferroic Eu 1-x Y x MnO 3 (x=0.2, 0.25) systems; interestingly, a coupling between metamagnetic behaviour and ferroelectric polarization with the external magnetic field has been noticed [12][13][14]. Though the exact origin of this effect is unclear, several mechanisms have been proposed in different systems, such as the field dependent orbital ordering in Pr 0.5 Ca 0.5 Mn 0.95 Co 0.05 O 3 [15], martensitic like transformation associated with interface strains in phase separated systems [9][10][11]16], spin quantum transition in Pr 5/8 Ca 3/8 MnO 3 [17], geometric frustration in garnets [18], spin reorientation in FeRh thin films [2] and magnetic field induced spin flop transition in Ca 3 CoMnO 6 [19]. In charge ordered manganite systems, the field induced magnetization irreversibility with first order nature was assigned to the intrinsic magnetic phase separation, i.e., the coexistence of competing magnetic phases in micro/nano length scales [20], where avalanche-like growth of FM clusters in the vicinity of critical magnetic field (H C ) lead to sharp changes in magnetization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%