2012
DOI: 10.1144/sp371.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic characterization of oil sands at Osmington Mills and Mupe Bay, Wessex Basin, UK

Abstract: This study combines magnetic experimentation and geochemical analysis on oil sands from Osmington Mills and Mupe Bay, Wessex Basin, UK to investigate the possibility of a relationship between hydrocarbons and magnetic mineralogy. Removal of hydrocarbons by chemical extraction was conducted to allow comparison of (1) oil sands and (2) cleaned sands. Detailed magnetic analysis including low-temperature and high-temperature experimentation revealed that all but one sample was dominated by siderite, identified by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests a pedoclimatic control. Emmerton et al (2012) found an inverse correlation between the magnetic susceptibility and the extracted organic matter content for samples from the Wessex Basin in SW England. These results indicate a complex relationship between existing magnetic minerals within the sandstones and the alteration of these magnetic minerals due to the multiplex biological activity and biodegradation of the oil.…”
Section: Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This suggests a pedoclimatic control. Emmerton et al (2012) found an inverse correlation between the magnetic susceptibility and the extracted organic matter content for samples from the Wessex Basin in SW England. These results indicate a complex relationship between existing magnetic minerals within the sandstones and the alteration of these magnetic minerals due to the multiplex biological activity and biodegradation of the oil.…”
Section: Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…SEM imaging is particularly important for differentiating between-usually-detrital pyrrhotite and authigenic greigite, which have very different morphologies, but similar magnetic behaviour during magnetic hysteresis when a maximum field of only ∼1 T is available (Roberts et al 2014). As the abundance of magnetic minerals was less typically <<0.001 per cent, magnetic extraction was needed before imaging (Emmerton et al 2012;Emmerton et al 2013b). Samples were crushed to an even grain size (∼50 μm), and passed through a Frantz electromagnet magnetic separator three times following the protocol developed by Chang Figure 1.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth mechanisms for greigite and pyrite are similar, therefore we treat them as a single iron sulphide signal. There are several possible mechanisms for this greigite and pyrite formation: (1) Abubakar et al (2015) demonstrated that source rocks in the oil kitchen can precipitate nanometric greigite (<100 nm), (2) diagenetic changes caused by hydrocarbon presence, are known to lead to the replacement of magnetite, hematite or siderite by iron sulphides such as greigite and pyrite (Burton et al 1993;Emmerton et al 2012) and ( 3) anaerobic biodegradation by sulphate reducing bacteria generates reduced sulphur (HSand H 2 S) which reacts with dissolved Fe 2+ (from replacement or dissolution of magnetite or hematite) to form diagenetic greigite (Reynolds et al 1990).…”
Section: Origin Of the Magnetic Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solvent extraction was carried out using a standard liquid extraction protocol (e.g. Emmerton et al, 2012) as follows: 1-3 g of powdered sample was suspended in a 93:7 v/v DCM/MeOH solution and agitated in a sonic bath. The resulting suspension was then centrifuged and the supernatant solution pipetted off.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%