2012
DOI: 10.1144/sp371.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remagnetization and chemical alteration of sedimentary rocks

Abstract: Chemical remagnetization is a very common phenomenon in sedimentary rocks and developing a greater understanding of the mechanisms has several benefits. Acquisition of a secondary magnetization is usually tangible evidence of a diagenetic event that can be dated by isolation of the chemical remanent magnetization and comparison of the pole position to the apparent polar wander path. This can be important because diagenetic investigations are frequently limited by the difficulty in constraining the time frames … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(190 reference statements)
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arrow directions correspond to decrease in magnetic stability and presumed increase in thermometamorphic activity closer to the NSZ. This conforms with other studies reporting rocks along collisional margins to be more intensely remagnetized compared to their counterparts within the indenting tectonic blocks (e.g., Dekkers and Linssen, 1989;McCabe and Elmore, 1989;Katz et al, 1998;Rowan and Roberts, 2008;Meijers et al, 2011;Appel et al, 2012;Elmore et al, 2012;Van Der Voo and Torsvik, 2012).…”
Section: Variations In Magnetic Behavior Towards the Nszsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The arrow directions correspond to decrease in magnetic stability and presumed increase in thermometamorphic activity closer to the NSZ. This conforms with other studies reporting rocks along collisional margins to be more intensely remagnetized compared to their counterparts within the indenting tectonic blocks (e.g., Dekkers and Linssen, 1989;McCabe and Elmore, 1989;Katz et al, 1998;Rowan and Roberts, 2008;Meijers et al, 2011;Appel et al, 2012;Elmore et al, 2012;Van Der Voo and Torsvik, 2012).…”
Section: Variations In Magnetic Behavior Towards the Nszsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This study reports the results of an integrated paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, and diagenetic investigation of the Marcellus Subgroup in the Appalachian Basin. Paleomagnetic data can be used to date diagenetic events, including hydrothermal fluid flow [ Elmore et al ., , ], maturation of organic matter [ Blumstein et al ., ], and clay diagenesis [ Katz et al ., ; Aubourg et al ., , ]. One or more of these diagenetic processes may have occurred in the Marcellus Subgroup, which makes the unit an ideal candidate for an integrated paleomagnetic and diagenetic study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…One of the reasons is that extraordinary pervasive remagnetization has occurred in these units [e.g., Kent et al , ; Dobson and Heller , ; Wang and Van Der Voo , ]. Indeed, such pervasive remagnetizations can obscure or remove the primary magnetization; however, remagnetization, especially chemical remanent magnetization (CRM), can also provide information on the processes of burial diagenesis, including the thermal maturation of organic matter and smectite‐to‐illite conversion [e.g., Lu et al , ; Woods et al , ; Zegers et al , ; Blumstein et al , ; Moreau et al , ; Manning and Elmore , ], and information on alteration events triggered by orogenic fluids, mineralizing fluids, migrated hydrocarbons, or weathering‐related fluids [e.g., Kilgore and Elmore , ; McCabe and Elmore , ; Elmore et al , , and references therein]. Presently, remagnetization data from south China, however, have rarely been applied in this way, and even the origin of the pervasive remagnetizations is still not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%