1995
DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(94)00250-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic brain stimulation: safety studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Safety studies have shown that single-pulse TMS is safe in normal subjects (13). In patients with epilepsy, Tassinari et al (14) first demonstrated the safety of single TMS, and Reutens et al (15) and Michelucci et al (16) later reported very similar results.…”
Section: Safety Issuessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Safety studies have shown that single-pulse TMS is safe in normal subjects (13). In patients with epilepsy, Tassinari et al (14) first demonstrated the safety of single TMS, and Reutens et al (15) and Michelucci et al (16) later reported very similar results.…”
Section: Safety Issuessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…According to Klass (1977), Kozelka et al (1990), Vaughan et al (1998), Goldman et al (2000) and Kalita et al (2006) the magnitudes of the rhythms of cortical origin, with special consideration given to the value of amplitude and its periodicity, are the basis for proper determination of brain bioelectrical activity, and are also connected with the precise definition of the physiological state of the CNS. This theory is supported by numerous authors (Chokroverty et al 1995, Intriligator et al 1995, Mahla 1997, Liporace et al 1998, Schack et al 1999, Goldman et al 2000, Wolpaw et al 2002, Armitage et al 2003, Ashequr et al 2005, LeVan et al 2006, and there are no studies challenging that theory.…”
Section: Determination Of a Normal Reaction Of The Cerebral Cortex Bimentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Chiuich and Orekhova's study, the subjects were exposed to 10 sessions of ELF-EMF, 16 whereas in other studies, subjects were exposed to only 1 or 2 sessions. [11][12][13]15 In addition, in Chiuich and Orekhova's study, subjects were hypertensive, whereas the subjects were normotensive in other studies. [11][12][13][14][15] In our study, subjects with clinically well-defined hypertension were involved; thus, the status of the subjects seems to be important in eliciting an effect of ELF-EMFs on BP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[11][12][13]15 In addition, in Chiuich and Orekhova's study, subjects were hypertensive, whereas the subjects were normotensive in other studies. [11][12][13][14][15] In our study, subjects with clinically well-defined hypertension were involved; thus, the status of the subjects seems to be important in eliciting an effect of ELF-EMFs on BP. This argument may be supported by our observation that ELF-EMF exposure seemed to have a greater effect on subjects in the ELF-EMF group at the start of the study (for example, during the first week, there were significant differences between the ELF-EMF and sham groups with respect to change in SBP values preand postexposure session), but had a lesser effect as subjects became normotensive (Table 2 and Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation