2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magmatic hydrothermal system inferred from the resistivity structure of Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also used the volume change of the point source explaining the cumulative eruptive deformation for approximately two years since the eruption. Although we should consider those factors to infer the ratio r v accurately, the inferred oblate deformation source does not contradict the alternating (thin) laminae of the low resistivity observed by the previous magnetotelluric survey (e.g., Matsunaga et al 2020).…”
Section: Data and Model Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also used the volume change of the point source explaining the cumulative eruptive deformation for approximately two years since the eruption. Although we should consider those factors to infer the ratio r v accurately, the inferred oblate deformation source does not contradict the alternating (thin) laminae of the low resistivity observed by the previous magnetotelluric survey (e.g., Matsunaga et al 2020).…”
Section: Data and Model Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The best-t width of the plane in Model C is 1500 m, which indicates that the bottom of the plane reaches an approximately depth of 1200 m. In contrast, the best-t point source was inferred to be emplaced at the middle part of the eastern edge of the dislocation plane ( Figure 12). Previous magnetotelluric surveys proposed a low-resistivity subsurface structure from Moto-Shirane volcano to Yugama crater lake at 1500-3000 m below the surface, with alternating thin laminae of low-and highresistivity layers between the surface and large conductor (Nurhasan et al 2006;Matsunaga et al 2020).…”
Section: Data and Model Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of volcanic earthquakes significantly decreases below sea level. Audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) (Nurhasan et al 2006) and magnetotelluric (MT) surveys (Matsunaga et al, 2020; Tseng et al, under review) detect a conductive region at a depth of 1-3.5 km from the surface, which almost corresponds low seismicity region in Fig. 2a.…”
Section: Seismicity and Hydrothermal System Structures At Kusatsu-shimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the comparison between our result and hypocenter distributions significantly suggests that excitations of examined volcanic tremor relate to the seismogenic zone beneath Ainomine. According to AMT and MT soundings, the eastern flank of Kusatsu-Shirane is covered by a conductive layer with a thickness of 0.3-1 km (Nurhasan et al 2006;Matsunaga et al, 2020;Tseng et al, under review).…”
Section: Interpretation For Examined Volcanic Tremor and Eruption Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-t width of the plane in Model C is 1500 m, which indicates that the bottom of the plane reaches an approximately depth of 1200 m. In contrast, the best-t point source was inferred to be emplaced at the middle part of the eastern edge of the dislocation plane ( Figure 12). Previous magnetotelluric surveys proposed a low-resistivity subsurface structure from Moto-Shirane volcano to Yugama crater lake at 1500-3000 m below the surface, with alternating thin laminae of low-and high-resistivity layers between the surface and large conductor (Nurhasan et al 2006;Matsunaga et al 2020). The large conductor implies the emplacement of volcanic uids that originated from the deep magma source and are con ned in a thick impermeable layer.…”
Section: Data and Model Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%