2008
DOI: 10.1021/bi801072s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MagicWand: A Single, Designed Peptide That Assembles to Stable, Ordered α-Helical Fibers

Abstract: We describe a straightforward single-peptide design that self-assembles into extended and thickened nano-to-mesoscale fibers of remarkable stability and order. The basic chassis of the design is the well-understood dimeric alpha-helical coiled-coil motif. As such, the peptide has a heptad sequence repeat, abcdefg , with isoleucine and leucine residues at the a and d sites to ensure dimerization. In addition, to direct staggered assembly of peptides and to foster fibrillogenesisthat is, as opposed to blunt-ende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both systems have an overall charge of þ1 per building block (a heterodimer in the case of 3rd-generation SAFs, and a monomer for MW1) and clear, persistent ultrastructure indicative of high levels of order. However, the sequence features of the designs, and how these may present in the ultrastructure and order are very different: both the 2nd and the 3rd-generation SAFs have a cluster of positive charge on the outer surfaces of the coiled-coil [22], whereas the MW1 has a single positive charge [26]. Interestingly, the biotineDE 3 tag recruited to the 3rd-generation SAFs, but not to MW1 fibers, Fig.…”
Section: Specificity and Longevity Of Bindingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both systems have an overall charge of þ1 per building block (a heterodimer in the case of 3rd-generation SAFs, and a monomer for MW1) and clear, persistent ultrastructure indicative of high levels of order. However, the sequence features of the designs, and how these may present in the ultrastructure and order are very different: both the 2nd and the 3rd-generation SAFs have a cluster of positive charge on the outer surfaces of the coiled-coil [22], whereas the MW1 has a single positive charge [26]. Interestingly, the biotineDE 3 tag recruited to the 3rd-generation SAFs, but not to MW1 fibers, Fig.…”
Section: Specificity and Longevity Of Bindingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Specific binding of the tags for the SAFs is clearly an important criterion; hence any binding of the biotineDE 3 tag, the best binder of the SAFs studied above, was tested against 3rd-generation SAFs and MagicWand (MW1) [21,26]. Both systems have an overall charge of þ1 per building block (a heterodimer in the case of 3rd-generation SAFs, and a monomer for MW1) and clear, persistent ultrastructure indicative of high levels of order.…”
Section: Specificity and Longevity Of Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydrophobic residues could promote the helix oligomerization through hydrophobic collapse. Another nanofibrous structure could also be formed using the peptides with central Glu amino acid and Lys amino acid at the end of the sequence through ionic interactions [91].…”
Section: -Helical Peptidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…165 Due to the destabilising placement of polar residues in the coiled-coil core, peptide fibrils were thermally unstable and required low temperatures for assembly. 165,167 Assembled morphology was controlled by the addition of modified peptides designed to introduce kinks 168 and branches 169 into the fibrils. More recent work by the same group has given the peptides hSAF AAA -p1 and hSAF AAA -p2.…”
Section: 150mentioning
confidence: 99%