2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magic-Angle Sample Spinning Electron Paramagnetic Resonance—Instrumentation, Performance, and Limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All experiments were performed on a Bruker ESP 380E spectrometer at frequencies of about 9.4 GHz and a temperature of 205 K. The homebuilt probehead for fast rotation at variable angles has been described elsewhere [14]. The angle between the rotation axis and the static field was generally 90°, except for the experiment (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All experiments were performed on a Bruker ESP 380E spectrometer at frequencies of about 9.4 GHz and a temperature of 205 K. The homebuilt probehead for fast rotation at variable angles has been described elsewhere [14]. The angle between the rotation axis and the static field was generally 90°, except for the experiment (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AR EPR provides information on the relative orientation of interaction tensors; however, with rotation frequencies below I kHz reorientation effects are too small for organic radicals with their much smaller anisotropies of the magnetic interactions. We have recently introduced MAS EPR with rotation frequencies up to 17 kHz, which yields isotropic EPR spectra for species with anisotropies below 20 MHz and is thus complementary to the RAS experiments [13,14]. Nevertheless, most organic radicals are accessible to neither of the two techniques because they feature anisotropies well above 10 MHz and not much higher than 100 MHz, which are too large for the MAS EPR experiment and too small for slow RAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that when the excitation bandwidth ν (given by γ B 1 ) is not comparable to the spectral bandwidth f , destructive interference between contributions of spins with similar resonance offsets can suppress the signal intensity (29). The phase dispersion of the magnetization that is excited off resonance becomes very significant, resulting in substantial sensitivity loss when the spectral bandwidth exceeds the excitation bandwidth by a factor of 5 or more.…”
Section: Spectral Excitation Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This growth occurs during the recovery of the preamplifier. Besides limiting the sensitivity of the spectrometer, the dead time may lead to considerable distortion in the spectral features, if the resulting truncated FID is Fourier transformed without any phase correction (28,29). Several phase correction procedures are routinely used in NMR spectroscopy (30).…”
Section: Spectrometer Dead Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the excitation bandwidth is not adequate to cover the spectral band width, then destructive interference between contributions of spins with similar resonance offsets can suppress the signal intensity. 119 Increasing the RF power can increase excitation bandwidth. The RF power P o available at the resonator is given by:…”
Section: /2mentioning
confidence: 99%