2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Pulsed and Continuous Wave Radiofrequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Techniques for in Vivo Detection and Imaging of Free Radicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a differential loss in the integrated intensity of the projections, causing artifacts in the back-projected image. 74 Such artifacts will be significant for oblong objects under large gradients. Attempts to increase the resolution by increasing the magnitude of the gradients will lead to further reduction of T seriously affected by the relaxation time, capable of providing artifact free images is crucial for the development of time-domain RF EPR in vivo imaging.…”
Section: Alternate Methods Of Spatial Encoding In Time-domain Eprimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This leads to a differential loss in the integrated intensity of the projections, causing artifacts in the back-projected image. 74 Such artifacts will be significant for oblong objects under large gradients. Attempts to increase the resolution by increasing the magnitude of the gradients will lead to further reduction of T seriously affected by the relaxation time, capable of providing artifact free images is crucial for the development of time-domain RF EPR in vivo imaging.…”
Section: Alternate Methods Of Spatial Encoding In Time-domain Eprimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 Using the same resonator (except for altered Q-factors), identical samples and filling factors, the two techniques have been evaluated for their potentials and limitations for in vivo spectroscopic and imaging applications. The assessment is based on the merits such as sensitivity, spatial and temporal resolution, field of view, image artifacts, viable spin probes and subjects of study.…”
Section: Comparison Between Cw Epr and Time-domain Eprmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 The pulse method has the advantage of speed of data acquisition compared with that of the CW method, while the sensitivity is compromised mainly due to large 'dead-times' required before capturing the signal. This loss of sensitivity, however, is compensated by the fast repetitive scan rates of 10-100 kHz that are possible in pulse EPR imaging.…”
Section: Cw Vs Pulse Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it requires the use of narrow-line spin probes such as trityl radicals. On the other hand, the CW mode enables the use of a variety of spin probes and still dominates current applications (10). However, due to the nature of field sweep, the imaging time in CW EPRI is relatively long (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%