2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maghemite quantification and magnetic signature of Brazilian soils with contrasting parent materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
20
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
20
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mineralogical composition of soils was consistent with reports of other authors regarding Fe-rich Rhodic Oxisols (Latossolos Vermelhos) derived from mafic rocks (Costa et al, 2014;Carvalho Filho et al, 2015;Camêlo et al, 2018;Poggere et al, 2018). Regardless of the particle size, the XRD analysis was not efficient in differentiating the ferrimagnetic Fe oxides, Mt, and Mh, because they present very similar XRD peaks, limiting an accurate identification (Fontes et al, 2000;Camêlo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Mineralogical Studysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The mineralogical composition of soils was consistent with reports of other authors regarding Fe-rich Rhodic Oxisols (Latossolos Vermelhos) derived from mafic rocks (Costa et al, 2014;Carvalho Filho et al, 2015;Camêlo et al, 2018;Poggere et al, 2018). Regardless of the particle size, the XRD analysis was not efficient in differentiating the ferrimagnetic Fe oxides, Mt, and Mh, because they present very similar XRD peaks, limiting an accurate identification (Fontes et al, 2000;Camêlo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Mineralogical Studysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The refinement consisted of a polynomial function to the baseline, the peaks were set through the pseudo-Voigt model and the angle parameters of Bragg U, V, and W to calculate the width at half height (WHH), where WHH = (Utan 2 θ + Vtanθ + W) 1/2 (Caglioti et al, 1958). The refinement quality was evaluated by the R exp index (Young, 1995), where values up to 20 are considered acceptable (Poggere et al, 2018).…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations