2014
DOI: 10.12739/nwsa.2014.9.3.1c0617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maddeni̇n Parçacikli Yapisi İle İlgi̇li̇ Kavram Yanilgilarinin Gi̇deri̇lmesi̇nde Modele Dayali Akti̇vi̇teleri̇n Etki̇si̇

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to macro-micro change model, researchers emphasized that these misconceptions were generated since students attempted to explain changes occurring on micro level with the mindset of observable changes occurring on macro level. Particle structure of the matter is the milestone of science and chemistry classes (Ergün & Sarıkaya, 2014), and the failure to comprehend micro and macro dimensions on relational grounds accurately will result with hardships in understanding the subject matter, causing other misconceptions among students. As can be seen in this research, false mental models on physical and chemical changes employed by students brought about misconceptions regarding several fundamental concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to macro-micro change model, researchers emphasized that these misconceptions were generated since students attempted to explain changes occurring on micro level with the mindset of observable changes occurring on macro level. Particle structure of the matter is the milestone of science and chemistry classes (Ergün & Sarıkaya, 2014), and the failure to comprehend micro and macro dimensions on relational grounds accurately will result with hardships in understanding the subject matter, causing other misconceptions among students. As can be seen in this research, false mental models on physical and chemical changes employed by students brought about misconceptions regarding several fundamental concepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with these opinions, necessary corrections were made where the concept map was found deficient. Afterward, national and international studies examining misconceptions within the scope of Pure Matter and Mixtures were examined (Arıkıl & Kalın, 2010;Akman & Özdilek, 2018;Bektaş, 2003;Ben-Zvi et al, 1988;Blanco & Prieto, 1997;Cokelez & Dumon, 2005;Çakır, 2005;Çalık & Ayas, 2005;Çökelez & Yalçın, 2012;Demirbaş, Altınışık, Tanrıverdi & Şahintürk, 2011;Dönmez, 2011;Ergün, 2013;Ergün & Sarıkaya, 2014;Geçgel & Şekerci, 2018;Griffiths & Preston, 1992;Gökulu, 2017;Gündüz, 2001;Harrison & Treagust, 1996;Karacop & Doymuş, 2013;Karaer, 2007;Kartal, 2017;Kingir, Geban & Gunel, 2013;Kılıç, 2017;Meşeci, Tekin & Karamustafaoğlu, 2013;Nakiboğlu, Karakoç & Benlikaya 2002;Ormancı & Balım, 2014;Othman, Treagust & Chandrasegaran, 2008;Say & Özmen, 2018;Saydam, 2013;Şeker, 2006;Tezcan & Salmaz, 2005;Unal & Zollman, 1999;Uzuntiryaki & Geban, 2005; and a pool was created with misconceptions appropriate to the scope of the subject. Four-choice multiple-choice questions were prepared with the misconceptions selected concerning the attainment of the Science Curriculum.…”
Section: Data Collection Tool Development Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atom can be crushed, its shape can change (Ergün, 2013;Ergün & Sarıkaya, 2014;Gündüz, 2001;Şeker, 2006;Tezcan & Salmaz, 2005). (While preparing this question, Sarıkaya, M. (1996).…”
Section: Attainmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students have the opportunity to develop scientifically correct mental models thanks to the models and modelling activities used in science education (Chittleborough & Treagust, 2007). Model/modelling-based teaching increases students' conceptual understanding and success levels (Ergün & Sarıkaya, 2019;Schwarz & White, 2005), helps to eliminate their existing misconceptions (Ergün & Sarıkaya, 2014;Okumuş & Doymuş, 2018), and builds a positive attitude towards the course and learning (Türk & Kalkan, 2017).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%