1995
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.35.866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrosegregation Behavior in Continuously Cast High Carbon Steel Blooms and Billets at the Final Stage of Solidification in Combination Stirring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jie ZENG, 1) * Weiqing CHEN, 1) Senlin ZHANG, 2) Yi LI 3) and Qiuliang WANG (Received on April 17, 2015; accepted on June 15, 2015) Production of continuously cast high carbon steel that very low center macrosegregation is an important object in meeting high quality requirements. Apart from the widely known methods of reducing macrosegregation during continuous casting, final permanent magnet stirring (FPMS) provides an alternative for producing steel with low macrosegregation.…”
Section: Development and Application Of Final Permanent Magnet Stirrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jie ZENG, 1) * Weiqing CHEN, 1) Senlin ZHANG, 2) Yi LI 3) and Qiuliang WANG (Received on April 17, 2015; accepted on June 15, 2015) Production of continuously cast high carbon steel that very low center macrosegregation is an important object in meeting high quality requirements. Apart from the widely known methods of reducing macrosegregation during continuous casting, final permanent magnet stirring (FPMS) provides an alternative for producing steel with low macrosegregation.…”
Section: Development and Application Of Final Permanent Magnet Stirrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The continuous casting of high carbon 82A steel with a section size of 180 mm × 240 mm has been improved considerably by low temperature casting and proper using of final electromagnetic stirring (FEMS), but their center carbon segregation appears not to be enough to satisfy customer's demand for best quality. Center segregation in high carbon steel results in a high concentrations of chemical components especially carbon element and has great influence on the quality of final product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6(a) by the short dashed line, carbon segregation has basically taken shape when the value of central liquid fraction reaches 0.3. According to consensus, performing the final electromagnetic stirring (F-EMS) or mechanical soft reduction at the region corresponding to high central solid fraction does not effectively improve centerline segregation, 40,41) for which the formation of segregation is also an important cause, apart from poor fluidity. The degree of carbon segregation at billet center increases from 1.0 to 1.147 along the casting direction, which leads to decrease of solidus temperature from 1 623 K to 1 596 K, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Evolution Of Macrosegregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, many techniques have been proposed to minimize the detrimental center carbon segregation in high-carbon continuous casting, such as low temperature casting, intensive cooling at the solidification end, soft reduction, large reduction, and electromagnetic stirring (EMS) [9][10][11]. Among those techniques, the combination of mold and final electromagnetic stirring (M-EMS and F-EMS) is known as one of the most effective and widely used methods to eliminate the macrosegregation of high-carbon square billet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%