2018
DOI: 10.1002/marc.201800180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroscopic Supramolecular Assembly through Electrostatic Interactions Based on a Flexible Spacing Coating

Abstract: Macroscopic supramolecular assembly (MSA) is a recent advance in supramolecular chemistry that involves associating large building blocks with a size larger than 10 µm through noncovalent interactions. However, until now the applicable material system is rather limited to hydrogels, and MSA of rigid materials with supramolecular interactions widely used in molecular assembly has rarely been reported due to the difficulty in achieving multivalency between rigid surfaces. Herein, the concept of flexible spacing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike molecular assembly, in which recognition and binding is reversible and can often obtain kinetic energy from the thermal motion of the components, the realization of MSA faces two major challenges: 1) The large surfaces through which supramolecular motifs interact are usually very rough on the molecular scale, which is unfavorable for realizing efficient interfacial supramolecular interactions; and (2) a driving force is required to achieve collision between and assembly of the macroscopic building blocks, as they are too large to be propelled. Until now, the first issue has been addressed by introducing a flexible spacing coating to mediate the surface roughness, while the second challenge is overcome with external agitation, such as rotation or shaking of the medium in which the macroscopic building blocks assemble, or magnetically assisted motion to cause directed diffusion and collision of the building blocks . As a result, the quality of the desired precise alignment of building blocks is poor compared with that of the alignment achieved by molecular self‐assemblies because the macroscopic assembly geometries are largely determined by complex dynamics during the agitation or shaking process, leading to facially offset, nonequilibrium assemblies, which are undesired .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike molecular assembly, in which recognition and binding is reversible and can often obtain kinetic energy from the thermal motion of the components, the realization of MSA faces two major challenges: 1) The large surfaces through which supramolecular motifs interact are usually very rough on the molecular scale, which is unfavorable for realizing efficient interfacial supramolecular interactions; and (2) a driving force is required to achieve collision between and assembly of the macroscopic building blocks, as they are too large to be propelled. Until now, the first issue has been addressed by introducing a flexible spacing coating to mediate the surface roughness, while the second challenge is overcome with external agitation, such as rotation or shaking of the medium in which the macroscopic building blocks assemble, or magnetically assisted motion to cause directed diffusion and collision of the building blocks . As a result, the quality of the desired precise alignment of building blocks is poor compared with that of the alignment achieved by molecular self‐assemblies because the macroscopic assembly geometries are largely determined by complex dynamics during the agitation or shaking process, leading to facially offset, nonequilibrium assemblies, which are undesired .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactive system is introduced through layer‐by‐layer assembly of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes onto thin PDMS sheets. This multilayer polyelectrolyte coating is produced by sequential deposition of a flexible spacing coating of poly(ethyleneimine)/poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), an antiadhesion layer of poly‐(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA)/poly(sodium‐ p ‐styrenesulfonate) (PSS), and an electrostatic interactive coating of PDDA/PAA with either PDDA or PAA as the outermost layer to give either a positively or negatively charged surface, as desired . The hydrogel cubes and the coated PDMS sheets are assembled with the abovementioned low‐density substrate of expanded polystyrene (EPS, density=0.011–0.032 g cm −3 , dimensions=8×8×5 mm 3 ) that was pretreated with a commercial fluorinated silane solution to induce superhydrophobicity for reduction of fluidic drag.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thei nteractive system is introduced through layer-by-layer assembly of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes onto thin PDMS sheets.T his multilayer polyelectrolyte coating is produced by sequential deposition of af lexible spacing coating of poly(ethyleneimine)/poly(acrylica cid) (PAA), an antiadhesion layer of poly-(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA)/poly(sodium-p-styrenesulfonate) (PSS), [12] and an electrostatic interactive coating of PDDA/ PA Awith either PDDAorP AA as the outermost layer to give either apositively or negatively charged surface,asdesired. [14] Theh ydrogel cubes and the coated PDMS sheets are assembled with the abovementioned low-density substrate of expanded polystyrene (EPS,d ensity = 0.011-0.032 gcm À3 , dimensions = 8 8 5mm 3 )t hat was pretreated with ac ommercial fluorinated silane solution to induce superhydrophobicity for reduction of fluidic drag.T wo positively or negatively charged PDMS sheets are attached to the EPS host in the orthogonal direction (see Scheme 1), and two SDS hydrogels are embedded in the other two side surfaces through two precut cavities with dimensions of 2 2 2mm 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%