2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrofaunal production and biological traits: Spatial relationships along the UK continental shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for this is that they do not encompass the full array of key macrobenthic functional traits that underpin ecosystem functioning and efficiency processes. Yet another more targeted approach, which focuses on biological traits analysis and has been proposed for the study of functional diversity (Bremner et al, 2003;Bremner, 2008;Bolam and Eggleton, 2014), also entails some limitations since our understanding of benthic functional diversity is still scant (Bolam et al, 2010). Furthermore, identification of the traits that have a direct and indirect functional role in ecosystems is highly problematic (Pakeman, 2011).…”
Section: Area Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible explanation for this is that they do not encompass the full array of key macrobenthic functional traits that underpin ecosystem functioning and efficiency processes. Yet another more targeted approach, which focuses on biological traits analysis and has been proposed for the study of functional diversity (Bremner et al, 2003;Bremner, 2008;Bolam and Eggleton, 2014), also entails some limitations since our understanding of benthic functional diversity is still scant (Bolam et al, 2010). Furthermore, identification of the traits that have a direct and indirect functional role in ecosystems is highly problematic (Pakeman, 2011).…”
Section: Area Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since functional diversity provides a direct mechanistic link between diversity and ecosystem functioning, a growing amount of research is being devoted to assessing the effect of functional-rather than taxon-diversity on ecosystem functioning (Petchey et al, 2004;Reiss et al, 2009). Numerous independent variables of functional traits, including feeding guilds, reproduction strategy, bioturbation mode and/or body shape (e.g., Ieno et al, 2006;Carvalho et al, 2013;Pape et al, 2013;Piot et al, 2014;Quéiros et al, 2015), and biological traits analysis (e.g., Bremner et al, 2003;Bolam and Eggleton, 2014) have been applied to express functional diversity. Nevertheless, there is currently no universally accepted methodology for selecting the most appropriate traits for a given study (Bolam, 2013), and quite often the selection is heavily affected by the limited biological information that is available for benthic invertebrate taxa (Bremner, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses were done on trait groups rather than by species abundances (Bolam and Eggleton, 2014), in order to analyse the effect of the exclusion of fisheries on the ecological functions and properties of the benthic community. The results indicate that less than 4% of the variation in trait groups and their corresponding modalities between the closed area and the surrounding fished area can be explained by fisheries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De gebruikte database is binnen het BENTHIS project ontwikkeld met als doel effecten van visserijdruk op het functioneren van het benthisch ecosysteem inzichtelijk te maken (Bolam and Eggleton, 2014). Deze database bevat informatie voor meer dan 850 taxa (op genus niveau) voor 10 verschillende modaliteiten welke de levensgeschiedenis, gedrag en morfologie van soorten beschrijven, zoals bijvoorbeeld levensverwachting, mobiliteit en voedselvoorkeur.…”
Section: Samenvattingunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation