Macrofauna Edáfica e Atributos Físicos e Químicos em Sistemas de Uso do Solo no Planalto Catarinense

Rosa, Márcio Gonçalves da; Filho, Osmar Klauberg; Bartz, Marie Luise Carolina; Mafra, Álvaro Luiz; Sousa, José Paulo; Baretta, Dilmar

doi:10.1590/01000683rbcs20150033

Cited by 42 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The SBQ results calculated by means of the EMI value for the larval phase ( Table 6), demonstrate that reduced total values of the index do not follow a land use intensity gradient (NF > EST > PA > CLI > NT), as it has been reported for soil macrofauna (Rosa et al, 2015). The SBQ gradients was highest in NF for winter and summer where: NF > CLI > PA > EST > NT and NF > CLI > NT > PA > EST, respectively (Table 6).…”

Section: Soil Biological Quality and Mean Value Of The Community Traitmentioning

confidence: 53%

“…The soils studied in Lages and Campo Belo do Sul were classified as Nitossolo Bruno (Humic Kandiudox) and those in Otacílio Costa as Cambissolo Húmico (Humic Dystrudept) (Rosa et al, 2015).…”

Section: Study Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The municipalities were selected according to their geographic properties, soil types, and management history and they are considered true replicates of the studied systems. Information on LUS properties and history is displayed in table 1, and further information was provided by Bartz et al (2014a) and Rosa et al (2015).…”

Section: Study Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Samples were collected using a 3 × 3 point grid, with sampling points at a distance of 30 m from each other and surrounded by a 20-m border, covering 1 ha for each LUS (Rosa et al, 2015;Oliveira Filho et al, 2016). A total of 270 points were sampled, consisting of nine points in five land use systems in three municipalities, in the two study periods.…”

Section: Sampling and Ecomorphological Characterization Of Coleopteramentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Morphological Diversity of Coleoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) in Agriculture and Forest Systems

Pompeo

Filho

Santos

et al. 2017

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coleopterans (Coleoptera) are major ecosystem service providers. However ecomorphological features that are comparable in a wide range of invertebrates within this group and in various environments must be found, to be able to study regions with different species, contributing to overcome difficulties of the taxonomic approach and understand the functioning of ecosystems. This research addressed the diversity of Coleoptera, using a methodology of ecomorphological traits, as well as their relation with the land use systems (LUS) and the soil properties. The following LUS were evaluated: no-tillage (NT), croplivestock integration (CLI), pasture (PA), Eucalyptus stands (EST), and native forest (NF). Samples were collected using a 3 × 3 point grid (sampling points at a distance of 30 m), in winter and summer, in three municipalities on the Southern Santa Catarina Plateau, Brazil. Coleopterans were collected using the methodology recommended by the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Program, based on the excavation of soil monoliths, and on pitfall traps. To evaluate the biological forms (morphotypes) and ecomorphological groups, the ecomorphological index (EMI) methodology was adopted and the modified soil biological quality (SBQ) index was determined. At the same points, samples were collected to evaluate environmental variables (soil physical, chemical, and microbiological properties). Density data underwent nonparametric univariate statistical analysis and multivariate abundance to verify the distribution of coleopterans in the LUS, and the environmental variables were considered as explanatory. Regardless of the LUS, 14 morphotypes were identified, and adult coleopterans with epigean morphologic adaptations were more abundant than hemi-edaphic and edaphic coleopterans, respectively. Morphotype diversity was higher in the systems NF, EST, and PA in summer and in NT in winter. The reductions in SBQ index were not associated with a gradient of land use intensification (NF> EST> PA> CLI> NT), and the index was higher for NF and lower for EST. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated a different distribution of invertebrates between the LUS. For the edaphic species, better adapted to life in the soil, a relation with NT and CLI was observed, due to more favorable pH values and phosphorus content. In the NF, a greater amount of morphotypes was identified, and the properties related to soil carbon dynamics contributed to explain this distribution. Separation at the morphotype level, taking adaptation level to soil life into consideration, has proved efficient to discriminate the LUS, mainly along with other explanatory environmental variables.

show abstract

Section: Soil Biological Quality and Mean Value Of The Community Traitmentioning

confidence: 53%

Section: Study Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sampling and Ecomorphological Characterization Of Coleopteramentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Morphological Diversity of Coleoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) in Agriculture and Forest Systems

Pompeo

Filho

Santos

et al. 2017

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Entretanto, quando não manejadas adequadamente pode resultar em aumento da perda de água por evaporação, perdas de nutrientes por erosão e aumento da compactação do solo e especialmente diminuição da diversidade da fauna edáfica (AMORIM et al, 2013;ROSA et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Fauna Edáfica Em Pastagem Perene Sob Diferentes Fontes De Nutrientes

Geremia

Segat²,

Fachini

et al. 2016

RSA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O presente estudo objetivou avaliar o efeito de fontes de adubação em pastagem de Tifton 85 sobre a fauna edáfica e a relação desta com as variáveis físico-químicas do solo. O experimento foi conduzido em um Latossolo testando três fontes de adubação: 1) orgânica com aplicação de adubo orgânico a base de cama de aves (O); 2) orgânica + mineral O + fertilizante mineral (OM) e 3) adubação mineral (M). O delineamento experimental foi constituído de blocos ao acaso com três repetições. A coleta para avaliação da fauna edáfica foi realizada por armadilhas do tipo “Trampas de Tretzel” e, nos mesmos pontos, foram coletadas amostras de solo para análise dos atributos químicos, mensurada a resistência à penetração e umidade do solo. Houve relação entre a abundância de grupos da fauna edáfica com algumas variáveis ambientais e físico-químicas do solo, especialmente a umidade, matéria orgânica, potássio e fósforo. O tratamento O proporcionou maiores valores de abundância e diversidade da fauna edáfica, não sendo a abundância diferente do tratamento OM.Palavras-chave: Bioindicadores, fauna do solo, sustentabilidade, análise multivariada.

show abstract