2019
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201903272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrocycle‐Directed Construction of Tetrahedral Anion–π Receptors for Nesting Anions with Complementary Geometry

Abstract: Manipulation of the emerging anion–π interactions in a highly cooperative manner through sophisticated host design represents a very challenging task. In this work, unprecedented tetrahedral anion–π receptors have been successfully constructed for complementary accommodation of tetrahedral and relevant anions. The synthesis was achieved by a macrocycle‐directed approach by using large macrocycle precursors bearing four reactive sites, which enabled a kinetic‐favored pathway and afforded the otherwise inaccessi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain binding selectivity for tetrahedral and octahedral anions, cage 8 embedding four tetrahedrally disposed triazine rings was synthesized (Scheme 3). 24 As shown by SCXRD, four triazine rings in 8 indeed form an electrondeficient tetrahedral cavity. Gratifyingly, it complexes preferentially with tetrahedral and octahedral anions.…”
Section: Anion−π Interactions In Selectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain binding selectivity for tetrahedral and octahedral anions, cage 8 embedding four tetrahedrally disposed triazine rings was synthesized (Scheme 3). 24 As shown by SCXRD, four triazine rings in 8 indeed form an electrondeficient tetrahedral cavity. Gratifyingly, it complexes preferentially with tetrahedral and octahedral anions.…”
Section: Anion−π Interactions In Selectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Among them, the motif c is suggested to be most energetically favorable. However, while the less stable motifs a and b have been frequently observed in crystal structures of complexes [26][27][28][32][33][34][35][36] and in biological anion- pairs, 21 the most stable motif c has barely been found. In the meantime, the subtle difference in the binding motifs could cause a large influence on relevant functions, e.g., catalysis 37,38 or macromolecular structuring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the strength of anion- interactions involving polyhedral, e.g., tetrahedral or octahedral anions is generally weak owing to the large size and low electron density of these anions. [26][27][28] On the other hand, the polyhedral shape of anions would in principle lead to diverse binding motifs when the anion approaches above an aromatic  surface. Indeed, theoretical calculation suggested different binding motifs (motifs a, b, c in Figure 1) exist, with different binding energy, binding geometry and anion- interacting distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible approach to achieve greater selectivity and affinity is to design receptors that can coordinate all four oxygen atoms of the tetrahedral anion. Such an approach haas been already implemented for recognition of sulfate and phosphate anions resulting in a highly selective binding [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%