2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrocognition through the Multiscale Enaction Model (MEM) Lens: Identification of a Blind Spot of Macrocognition Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We plead for a multiscale approach to occupational health, in which individual/dispositional and organizational/environmental factors are taken into account relationally [11]. Doing so, we warn investigators against the risk of ideologically favoring one level of explanation (e.g., individual) over another (e.g., organizational), by acting as if the answers to job stress research questions lay either exclusively in internal, individual-related factors or exclusively in external, organization-related factors.…”
Section: Moving From Burnout To Job-induced Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plead for a multiscale approach to occupational health, in which individual/dispositional and organizational/environmental factors are taken into account relationally [11]. Doing so, we warn investigators against the risk of ideologically favoring one level of explanation (e.g., individual) over another (e.g., organizational), by acting as if the answers to job stress research questions lay either exclusively in internal, individual-related factors or exclusively in external, organization-related factors.…”
Section: Moving From Burnout To Job-induced Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research problems in (behavioral) sciences usually involve multiscale structures (Laurent, 2014 ). The inability to carry out multi-layered investigations often leads to a neglect of either microscale- or macroscale-level determinants of behavior (Laurent and Bianchi, 2016 ). Unfortunately, this state of affairs can contribute to the development of parallel and poorly-interacting theoretical scaffoldings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%