2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macro-mechanical modeling and experimental validation of anisotropic, pressure- and temperature-dependent behavior of short fiber composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a next step, the sophisticated models developed in refs. [40,41] will be employed to numerically investigate the failure behavior of the studied materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a next step, the sophisticated models developed in refs. [40,41] will be employed to numerically investigate the failure behavior of the studied materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a smaller influence is expected than for the investigated 2 mm thick plate. In addition, the layer structure is influenced by the fiber content, as shown in [45] for a long fiber reinforced PP and PA6 and in [46] for a short fiber reinforced polyamide with fiber contents of 30% and 60%. In general, the formation of the layer structure is determined by a complex interplay of influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In classical Continuum Damage Mechanics CDM, the total internal energy is a state function of strain tensor  and internal damage like variable d [1], [12], [13] The consistent generalization of the isotropic damage formulation for the consideration of different failure mechanisms can be postulated by the additive decomposition of the total internal energy into multiple contributions, in which each of them is associated with a certain failure mechanism. In such a postulation, a scalar damage variable Herein, this additive decomposition postulation is applied within the context of PF approach to fracture for the prediction intra-laminar failure in UFRPs.…”
Section: Multi Phase-field Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%