2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machining of Carbon Fibre: Optical Surface Damage Characterisation and Tool Wear Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to subsurface damage results discussed in Section 3.4, R20 experienced the lowest Ssk value (Figure 11d)) which is correlated with limited material pull-out that is linked with the rubber toughening mechanism, followed by silica and unmodified epoxy composite. As the fact that the most damage is created in the 135° plies was previously reported in the literature [46], [47], Ssk is considered an effective parameter which is able to link the subsurface damage to surface metrics results for 135° fibre orientation.…”
Section: Subsurface Damage Analysis In Relation To Chip Formation Mec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to subsurface damage results discussed in Section 3.4, R20 experienced the lowest Ssk value (Figure 11d)) which is correlated with limited material pull-out that is linked with the rubber toughening mechanism, followed by silica and unmodified epoxy composite. As the fact that the most damage is created in the 135° plies was previously reported in the literature [46], [47], Ssk is considered an effective parameter which is able to link the subsurface damage to surface metrics results for 135° fibre orientation.…”
Section: Subsurface Damage Analysis In Relation To Chip Formation Mec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is 10.75% decrease in surface roughness of machined samples of carbon epoxy composite by using optimum levels of parameters. Some studies have reported 3236 on traditional machining of carbon epoxy composite. Surface roughness ( R a ) observed in these studies ranges from 2.87 to 4.012.…”
Section: Optimization Using Grey Relational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors proved the surface roughness increased with machining distance generally following a steady trend. They also reported that diamond coated tool with multiple cutting teeth or also known as burrs tool was able to produce a good quality surface although at high feed rate, V f in comparison with polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tool [17,18]. Souhir Gara and Oleg Tsoumarev performed a series of comparison study on a few different micro-grain of burr tool which categorized into fine, medium and coarse type in slotting CFRP material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%