1994
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1994.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" or "other-" evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems unlikely that a majority of these participants suffered from a social or psychological deficiency that led them to believe that computers are actually human. Moreover, when debriefed, participants in the studies insisted they would not respond socially to a computer and strongly denied that they would ever exhibit the behaviours they had actually shown in the studies (Nass, Steuer et al, 1994a;Nass, Fogg et al, 1996;Nass and Moon, 2000). Such denials are inconsistent with the idea that the participants actually believe that computers are essentially human 1 .…”
Section: Explanations For the Media Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems unlikely that a majority of these participants suffered from a social or psychological deficiency that led them to believe that computers are actually human. Moreover, when debriefed, participants in the studies insisted they would not respond socially to a computer and strongly denied that they would ever exhibit the behaviours they had actually shown in the studies (Nass, Steuer et al, 1994a;Nass, Fogg et al, 1996;Nass and Moon, 2000). Such denials are inconsistent with the idea that the participants actually believe that computers are essentially human 1 .…”
Section: Explanations For the Media Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'computer as a proxy' argument is based on the notion that when an individual responds socially to a computer they are, in fact, responding to the machine as a human artefact. That is, the machine is merely a medium that embodies the responses of the producer or programmer (Nass and Steuer, 1993;Nass, Steuer et al, 1994a;Nass, Steuer et al, 1994b;Nass, Fogg and Moon, 1996;Nass and Moon, 2000;Sundar and Nass, 2000). Inherent in both the anthropomorphism and computer as proxy explanations is that individuals' social responses to technology are consistent with their beliefs about the technology: the computer is treated like a person because it either is perceived to be or perceived to represent a human being.…”
Section: Explanations For the Media Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nass et al [43] found that people respond socially to computing technology even when they believe that they should not. Further, Reeves and Nass [44] suggest that 'all people automatically and unconsciously respond socially to media even though they believe that it is not reasonable to do so'.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender stereotypes were observed: users trust more a machine endowed with a male voice and estimate that a machine having a female voice has higher relational skills [43]. Nass et al [44] observe that standards of social utility and social desirability also applied to HCI. The performances of computers are judged as being superior when they are valorized by other computers that when it is the computer that praises itself.…”
Section: Personality Of Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Van den Bosch et al [66] selected only extraversion and agreeableness to impact the conversational behavior of a virtual house buyer. Nass et al [44][42] propose models of virtual agents based on the social context and intra individual differences. A few other authors base their models on a socio-cognitive approach, which focuses on understanding the cognitive, emotional, and social processes that characterizes individuals.…”
Section: Personality Of Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%