2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning techniques to select Be star candidates

Abstract: Context. Optical and infrared variability surveys produce a large number of high quality light curves. Statistical pattern recognition methods have provided competitive solutions for variable star classification at a relatively low computational cost. In order to perform supervised classification, a set of features is proposed and used to train an automatic classification system. Quantities related to the magnitude density of the light curves and their Fourier coefficients have been chosen as features in previ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solarz et al 2017;Ksoll et al 2018), or artificial neural networks (Snider et al 2001;Hampton et al 2017). However, similar performances are achieved with most of the algorithms and it is evident that the output is mainly dominated by the quality of the training data (Pérez-Ortiz et al 2017;Pashchenko et al 2018, or Marton et al 2019 in a similar problem of identifying YSOs). Therefore, we decided to use a shallow artificial neural network as it has the advantage of flexibility and non-linearity, being able to describe very complex and subtle relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Solarz et al 2017;Ksoll et al 2018), or artificial neural networks (Snider et al 2001;Hampton et al 2017). However, similar performances are achieved with most of the algorithms and it is evident that the output is mainly dominated by the quality of the training data (Pérez-Ortiz et al 2017;Pashchenko et al 2018, or Marton et al 2019 in a similar problem of identifying YSOs). Therefore, we decided to use a shallow artificial neural network as it has the advantage of flexibility and non-linearity, being able to describe very complex and subtle relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Elorrieta et al (2016) used machine learning to identify RRab stars in the VVV survey data (Minniti et al 2010). Pérez-Ortiz et al (2017) propose a set of light curve features robust to individual outlier measurements and use them to compare multiple machine learning algorithms on classified OGLE-III light curves. Zinn et al (2017) consider an original set of features suitable for characterizing non-periodic and quasi-periodic light curves: parameters of the damped random walk and quasi-periodic oscillation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used as training sample the following OGLE-III variable stars: Cepheids, RR Lyrae, δ Scuti, long-period variables, type II Cepheids, eclipsing binaries, a set of OGLE-III BeSC reported in the literature, and samples of BeSC reported in previous works. The best classifier to select BeSC was random forests ( [4]). We used this classifier, and later color criteria, to search for BeSC within the OGLE-IV Gaia South Ecliptic Pole Field data.…”
Section: Techniques Used In Searches For Bescmentioning
confidence: 99%