2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning rate constants of hydrogen abstraction reactions between ester and H atom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, some attention were also paid to directly predict rate constants by machine learning. Houston et al utilized Gaussian process regression to fit thermal rate constants for a collection of 13 gas-phase bimolecular reactions across a large temperature range. ,, The reactions were characterized by three parameters: Eckart tunneling, skew angle, and reactant symmetric stretch vibrational frequency. The predicted rate constants averaged over the 39 test reactions exhibited an accuracy within 80% of the precise quantum rate constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, some attention were also paid to directly predict rate constants by machine learning. Houston et al utilized Gaussian process regression to fit thermal rate constants for a collection of 13 gas-phase bimolecular reactions across a large temperature range. ,, The reactions were characterized by three parameters: Eckart tunneling, skew angle, and reactant symmetric stretch vibrational frequency. The predicted rate constants averaged over the 39 test reactions exhibited an accuracy within 80% of the precise quantum rate constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note also that both the XGBoost and FNN models are widely used to build the Quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) of molecular structure and properties, such as toxicity, 28,29 density/heat capacity, 30 surface tension/viscosity, 31 and reaction constants. 32 To further enhance the novelty, we construct an interpretable ML model using varied molecular descriptors, such as a molecular structure descriptor (MSD), GC, and a hybrid GC−MSD. These descriptors are integrated into both XGBoost and FNN models, allowing for a comparative analysis of their performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, we recognize the robustness and high performance of both RF and XGBoost as ML algorithms; each presents its own unique strengths and weaknesses. It is important to note also that both the XGBoost and FNN models are widely used to build the Quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) of molecular structure and properties, such as toxicity, , density/heat capacity, surface tension/viscosity, and reaction constants …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average deviation of the XGB-FNN model on the prediction set was about 40%. The XGB-FNN model was also applied to predict rate constants of the H + methyl decanoate reactions over a temperature range of 300–2000 K, giving a deviation of 16.5%–84.9% from the calculated values . All of these studies have shown that machine learning models are capable of accurately predicting rate constants of combustion reactions with well-designed molecular descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%