2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning predicts electrospray particle size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that flow rate and conductivity are the most important features for predicting drop diameters during electrospray. This is consistent with the findings of Wang et al [ 17 ] who also reported flow rate as the most important feature and voltage as another major feature in determining the diameter of ejected droplet. For predicting current in electrospray, features like voltage and nozzle diameter are the most important, while nozzle–substrate distance, permittivity, and surface tension are comparatively less important in the prediction of spray current.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results show that flow rate and conductivity are the most important features for predicting drop diameters during electrospray. This is consistent with the findings of Wang et al [ 17 ] who also reported flow rate as the most important feature and voltage as another major feature in determining the diameter of ejected droplet. For predicting current in electrospray, features like voltage and nozzle diameter are the most important, while nozzle–substrate distance, permittivity, and surface tension are comparatively less important in the prediction of spray current.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to predicting nanofiber diameters, ML techniques have also been used in classifying produced nanofibers into homogeneous (anomaly‐free) and nonhomogeneous (with defects) products, based on a hybrid unsupervised and supervised learning algorithm. [ 16 ] Wang et al [ 17 ] applied different ML models to predict the diameter of droplets produced by electrospraying considering applied voltage, solution flow rate, nozzle–substrate distance, nozzle diameter, and solution properties. Based on the testing performance, Wang et al [ 17 ] reported that tree‐based algorithm (particularly XGBoost) exhibits best results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model could predict Dp 50 at known experimental conditions or setting the process variables to achieve a given size, which was useful for a system capable of precise particle formation and scaling up BUDP. Besides, the modelling relationship between electrospraying product diameter and key experiment parameters were established by machine learning ( Wang et al, 2022b ), which could expedite the optimization process by accurately predicting particle diameter for both nano- and micron-sized particles.…”
Section: Characterization Of Zein-based Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthcare, ML is used in clinical trials, diagnostics and surgery (Giorgio et al, 2022;Halamka et al, 2022;Myszczynska et al, 2020;Shah et al, 2019;Zame et al, 2020). In pharmaceutics, ML models have been applied to model drug-food interactions, drug-microbiome interactions, and formulation development (Gavins et al, 2022;McCoubrey et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2022). For 3D printing medicines, ML has been demonstrated to predict printability, drug release rate, and accelerating quality control (Elbadawi et al, 2020a;Muñiz Castro et al, 2021;O'Reilly et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%