2020
DOI: 10.1587/elex.17.20200345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning model for predicting threshold voltage by taper angle variation and word line position in 3D NAND flash memory

Abstract: In this letter, a machine learning (ML) model is presented to predict the variation of the threshold voltage (Vth) according to the taper angle and target word line (WLT) position in 3D NAND flash memory. Through Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) simulation, Vth is extracted according to taper angle and WLT position. TCAD data is used as the training data set required for learning by an artificial neural network algorithm (NNA). The completed ML model is then used to predict Vth for each word line (WL). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Kumar et al chose the minimum tunneling width of tunneling field-effect transistors as a variable to predict threshold voltage, reporting an R 2 value of 96.5%, 24 and Lee et al employed deep neural regression and trained threshold voltage for the structural parameters of 3D NAND flash memories, achieving a relative error of 0.28%. In contrast to previous TCAD-based reports, 25 Akbar et al applied random forest regression and trained the relationship between transfer curves and the length and width of tunneling field-effect transistors as input data. 26 Machine learning-based predictions were compared with those produced by simulations, confirming a root mean squared error of 1.2% to 4.4%.…”
Section: Data Number Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Kumar et al chose the minimum tunneling width of tunneling field-effect transistors as a variable to predict threshold voltage, reporting an R 2 value of 96.5%, 24 and Lee et al employed deep neural regression and trained threshold voltage for the structural parameters of 3D NAND flash memories, achieving a relative error of 0.28%. In contrast to previous TCAD-based reports, 25 Akbar et al applied random forest regression and trained the relationship between transfer curves and the length and width of tunneling field-effect transistors as input data. 26 Machine learning-based predictions were compared with those produced by simulations, confirming a root mean squared error of 1.2% to 4.4%.…”
Section: Data Number Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, considering process variation is essential for the bit error rate prediction, and this approach does not provide the variability models for GIDL characteristics. In [10][11], the authors proposed a machine learning approach that reproduces the variations of threshold voltage (V th ) and current (I on ) in the 3D V-NAND cells. The model is based on an artificial neural network (ANN) whose inputs are variability sources and electrical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%