2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning in microseismic monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the SVD method, the FSVD method retained the effective signals better in both the high-Figure 10. Analysis of noise removal effect of FSVD under different SNR: (a) Results of high SNR signal before and after denoising(channels 5#): 1 The original signal before denoising, 2 the signal after FSVD denoising, 3 is the amplitude distribution of the original signal in the time-frequency domain, the larger the amplitude, the darker the color. 4 is the amplitude distribution of the signal after denoising in the time-frequency domain.…”
Section: Comparison and Analysis Of The Effect Of Noise Reduction By ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the SVD method, the FSVD method retained the effective signals better in both the high-Figure 10. Analysis of noise removal effect of FSVD under different SNR: (a) Results of high SNR signal before and after denoising(channels 5#): 1 The original signal before denoising, 2 the signal after FSVD denoising, 3 is the amplitude distribution of the original signal in the time-frequency domain, the larger the amplitude, the darker the color. 4 is the amplitude distribution of the signal after denoising in the time-frequency domain.…”
Section: Comparison and Analysis Of The Effect Of Noise Reduction By ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often used to monitor and evaluate the final fracturing effect in oil and gas, mining, and other fields [1,2]. However, the amount of microseismic monitoring data is huge, and there is complex background noise interference, which is inconvenient for later data processing and analysis [3,4]. Therefore, in microseismic monitoring technology, noise reduction and the filtering of microseismic mine signals are important prerequisites for rapid and accurate analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection and characterization of microseismic events using machine learning have become a topic of increasing interest, as evidenced in the recent review of Anikiev et al. (2023). In Waheed et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study considers one such problem, that of the detection of induced seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, located in the province of the same name in the Netherlands. The detection and characterization of microseismic events using machine learning have become a topic of increasing interest, as evidenced in the recent review of Anikiev et al (2023). In Waheed et al (2020), a simple LR model -essentially, a minimally shallow neural network without a hidden layer -with five trainable parameters was used for low-magnitude earthquake detection in data from this area, on the grounds that the interpretability of such a model would highly advantageous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent advances in deep learning have shown promising results in detecting impulsive sounds. In particular, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown remarkable performance in sound classification tasks [3][4][5]. The use of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) has also been shown to be effective in modeling sequential data such as audio signals [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%