2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92030-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning based prediction of lattice thermal conductivity for half-Heusler compounds using atomic information

Abstract: Half-Heusler compound has drawn attention in a variety of fields as a candidate material for thermoelectric energy conversion and spintronics technology. When the half-Heusler compound is incorporated into the device, the control of high lattice thermal conductivity owing to high crystal symmetry is a challenge for the thermal manager of the device. The calculation for the prediction of lattice thermal conductivity is an important physical parameter for controlling the thermal management of the device. We exam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline and active sampling models use on average 5.7 and 6.3 features out of the 14 potential features, respectively. The relatively few features used is in line with the recent results of Miyazaki et al [70] showing that using a limited feature subset gives the best ML performance, as overfitting can arise with redundant features. In both the baseline and active sampling models, B and V are the most frequently selected features, which agrees with their high Spearman correlation with κ TDEP as discussed in the previous section.…”
Section: Exhaustive Feature Selection Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline and active sampling models use on average 5.7 and 6.3 features out of the 14 potential features, respectively. The relatively few features used is in line with the recent results of Miyazaki et al [70] showing that using a limited feature subset gives the best ML performance, as overfitting can arise with redundant features. In both the baseline and active sampling models, B and V are the most frequently selected features, which agrees with their high Spearman correlation with κ TDEP as discussed in the previous section.…”
Section: Exhaustive Feature Selection Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
“…While the performance gain when using more complex features and larger training sets has been demonstrated in earlier studies [20][21][22][23][70][71][72][73], this work clearly shows that rather modest training set sizes and low feature complexity can still give reliable predictions with the use of active sample selection. Finally, we note that the use of a semi-random selection, rather than one that is truly random do accentuate the performance gains of the active sampling model.…”
Section: Enhanced Machine Learning Performance With Active Samplingsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The availability of such databases is facilitating the data-driven accelerated discovery of novel materials, for instance, using machine learning techniques. Owing to the high computational cost of phonon thermal conductivity prediction (10000-100000 cpu-hours compared to only 1-10 cpuhours for simpler properties), however, the available data on phonon thermal conductivity of materials is scarce; limited majorly to monoatomic and diatomic compounds with simple crystal structures [15][16][17][18]. Further, the available data is obtained using different computational packages employing diverse methodologies/simulation parameters [3,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though such DFT driven thermal conductivity calculations are instrumental in correctly describing the material thermal transport physics and thus accelerating noble material discovery compared to the experimental trialerror approach by manifold, these calculations are computationally expensive and require, for instance, a single computer running for 10,000-100,000 hours to arrive at a thermal conductivity of a single material [6]. Thus, the application of such calculations is limited to simple material systems, and computational exploration of new materials is restricted to the simple substitution of one or two atomic species in known material systems [15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation