2020
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz157
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning approaches and databases for prediction of drug–target interaction: a survey paper

Abstract: The task of predicting the interactions between drugs and targets plays a key role in the process of drug discovery. There is a need to develop novel and efficient prediction approaches in order to avoid costly and laborious yet not-always-deterministic experiments to determine drug–target interactions (DTIs) by experiments alone. These approaches should be capable of identifying the potential DTIs in a timely manner. In this article, we describe the data required for the task of DTI prediction followed by a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
175
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 295 publications
0
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of machine learning models to predict the binding affinity between new drug-target pairs has been demonstrated in various studies. Bagherian et al (44) briefly reviewed drug-target interaction prediction by machine learning models. Recently, machine learning methods have been used to search for cures for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (45-47), which has given direction for the promotion of new drug discovery.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of machine learning models to predict the binding affinity between new drug-target pairs has been demonstrated in various studies. Bagherian et al (44) briefly reviewed drug-target interaction prediction by machine learning models. Recently, machine learning methods have been used to search for cures for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (45-47), which has given direction for the promotion of new drug discovery.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mechanisms can still be tested using gene manipulation techniques such as CRISPR, non-coding RNAs, and/or gene overexpression to prove the concepts, encouraging researchers and pharmaceutical companies to design therapeutics for these candidate targets. Rapid growing in the field of computational drug discovery, artificial intelligence, and big pharmacogenomic/proteomic databases and tools [107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115] to predict molecular targets, mechanisms of action, drug responses and adverse effects will eventually benefit the pipeline of the master regulator-targeted immunotherapeutic strategies, even though rounds of extensive benchmarking and testing in vitro and in vivo are needed before full potentials of in silico approaches can be unleashed in clinical settings. Implementation of the user-friendly, web-based programs brings a huge opportunity to scientists and clinicians knowledgeable in biology and disease-specific contexts but have less-to-no coding skills.…”
Section: Prospects On Therapeutic Targeting Master Regulators Of Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different ML methods have recently been applied to predict DTIs based on the various types of datasets [ 15 , 16 ]. The computational drug–target methods can be divided into three groups: ligand-based methods [ 17 , 18 ], docking-based methods [ 19 , 20 ] and chemogenomic methods [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%