2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-022-01399-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment

Abstract: Purpose of Review This review will cover the most relevant findings on the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in the field of non-affective psychosis, by summarizing the studies published in the last three years focusing on illness detection and treatment. Recent Findings Multiple ML tools that include mostly supervised approaches such as support vector machine, gradient boosting, and random forest showed promising results by applying these algorithms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…116 Besides more accessible administration formats, novel screening techniques, including digital phenotyping or machine learning algorithms based on electronic health record or speech and language data may improve screening techniques. [117][118][119] While this field remains nascent and such automated screening methods are not yet regularly available or integrated into clinical practice, "digital phenotyping" shows significant promise for improving screening while reducing clinician burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116 Besides more accessible administration formats, novel screening techniques, including digital phenotyping or machine learning algorithms based on electronic health record or speech and language data may improve screening techniques. [117][118][119] While this field remains nascent and such automated screening methods are not yet regularly available or integrated into clinical practice, "digital phenotyping" shows significant promise for improving screening while reducing clinician burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem to overcome will be the imbalance of the data set, that is, when there is an unequal distribution of classes in the data set. In such instances, a standard machine learning technique, such as a support vector machine or random forest [ 60 , 61 ], will be applied. Moreover, each patient could potentially be considered as a distinct time series by including the temporal dimension of the treatment and by applying recurrent neural networks [ 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A definite level of immunoinflammatory activation, according to our data, remains also in the period of medically induced remission. However, application of ML methods has not yet been studied for verification of schizophrenia diagnosis by assessing the level of systemic inflammation markers [11,12]. At the same time, there are several investigations, in which interconnections have been established between the level of some markers of systemic inflammation and clinical characteristics of schizophrenia including the intensity of cognitive function impairment (TNF-α, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, cortisol), neurocognitive defect (IL-1β, sIL-1RA, TNF-α), acute or chronic course of the disease (TNF-α, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, cortisol) [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are a few works devoted to the study of some immunity parameters for objectifying the diagnosis of schizophrenia with ML methods [10]. Besides, the ML methods have not yet been applied to the datasets fully reflecting systemic characteristics of immune status (parameters of adaptive immunity, the level of inflammatory markers, content of major cytokines) [11][12][13]. Taking into consideration a complex character of immune system disorders in schizophrenia, inclusion into ML a broad panel of immunological data is a promising task for improving classification accuracy and selecting the variable parameters typical for the majority of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%