2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12060928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Forage Nutritive Value of In Situ Perennial Ryegrass Plants Using Hyperspectral Canopy Reflectance Data

Abstract: Nutritive value (NV) of forage is too time consuming and expensive to measure routinely in targeted breeding programs. Non-destructive spectroscopy has the potential to quickly and cheaply measure NV but requires an intermediate modelling step to interpret the spectral data. A novel machine learning technique for forage analysis, Cubist, was used to analyse canopy spectra to predict seven NV parameters, including dry matter (DM), acid detergent fibre (ADF), ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF), in vivo dry matte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digestibility can be measured routinely with NIRS (near-infrared spectroscopy) analyses, from which parameters as the D-value (digestibility of organic matter in dry matter), WSC (water soluble carbohydrates) or similar feed quality features can be predicted [96]. However, NIRS uses destructive sampling and is too costly and time-intensive for large scale application in breeding programs [97]. Several studies indicate that hand-held hyperspectral sensors can provide a non-destructive and fast alternative, possibly suited for breeding purposes [97][98][99].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digestibility can be measured routinely with NIRS (near-infrared spectroscopy) analyses, from which parameters as the D-value (digestibility of organic matter in dry matter), WSC (water soluble carbohydrates) or similar feed quality features can be predicted [96]. However, NIRS uses destructive sampling and is too costly and time-intensive for large scale application in breeding programs [97]. Several studies indicate that hand-held hyperspectral sensors can provide a non-destructive and fast alternative, possibly suited for breeding purposes [97][98][99].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NIRS uses destructive sampling and is too costly and time-intensive for large scale application in breeding programs [97]. Several studies indicate that hand-held hyperspectral sensors can provide a non-destructive and fast alternative, possibly suited for breeding purposes [97][98][99]. Hyperspectral sensing from UAVs has been demonstrated to be suitable for estimating forage grass digestibility [96].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has not been implemented with a row crop; however, it was recently tested with perennial ryegrass. The authors used a hyperspectral radiometer as well as a light shield in order to capture the spectra under stable light conditions from 960 different plants, comprised of 50 experimental perennial ryegrass varieties ( Smith et al , 2020 ). The light shield was manually placed on each plant, and artificial light within the shield was used as the light source.…”
Section: Translocation Of Water-soluble Carbohydratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After weighing, the sample is dried in an oven to determine the amount of dry biomass [67]. Cut and dry is the most common reference data collection method in biomass estimation studies, and it has been used in various recent studies [69][70][71][72][73]. The method provides objective reference data, but the cutting phase can include lot of variation.…”
Section: Differences With Other Uav Imaging Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method provides objective reference data, but the cutting phase can include lot of variation. In studies where biochemical parameters such as the nitrogen or digestibility of grass were estimated, the reference samples were analysed in a laboratory, most commonly using the NIRS (near-infrared spectroscopy) technique [69,72,73], providing numerical comparable values.…”
Section: Differences With Other Uav Imaging Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%