2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00197-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machinability of austenitic stainless steel SS303

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Tekiner et al [21] have developed measurement methods to compare process sound with the cutting parameters in turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Sullivan et al [22] have proposed the on-line work hardening detection techniques to study the machinability of SS303 austenitic stainless steel. Salak et al [23] have proposed an experimental method to compare the machinability of different powder metallurgy steels in face turning configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tekiner et al [21] have developed measurement methods to compare process sound with the cutting parameters in turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Sullivan et al [22] have proposed the on-line work hardening detection techniques to study the machinability of SS303 austenitic stainless steel. Salak et al [23] have proposed an experimental method to compare the machinability of different powder metallurgy steels in face turning configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nordin et al [7] found that a multilayered TiN/TaN coating outperformed single layered TiN and TaN inserts due to its lower tool-chip interaction. Giu et al [8] reported that TiAlN coated inserts produced high wear resistance than TiN and [9] studied the machinability of AISI 303 stainless steels with an emphasis on work hardening effect during machining using on-line techniques. Some studies indicated that the machinability of stainless steels can be improved by adding oxide forming elements, such as sulphide and calcium [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Problems such as poor surface finish and high tool wear are common. 5 Work hardening is recognised to be responsible for the poor machinability of austenitic stainless steels. 6 In addition, they bond very strongly to the cutting tool during cutting and when a chip is broken away, it may bring with it a fragment of the tool, particularly when cutting with cemented carbide tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%