2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mach stem hysteresis: Experiments addressing a novel explanation of clumpy astrophysical jet emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple-epoch HST images show evidence for time-variable enhanced emission at intersection points of bow shocks exists in HH 34S and possibly also HH 47A (Hartigan et al 2011). Laboratory experiments of this phenomena have quantified the critical angles where Mach stems can form (Foster et al 2010;Yirak et al 2013), and the experiments agree reasonably well with the theoretical and numerical predictions.…”
Section: Narrow [S Ii] Filaments In the South Pillars Regionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Multiple-epoch HST images show evidence for time-variable enhanced emission at intersection points of bow shocks exists in HH 34S and possibly also HH 47A (Hartigan et al 2011). Laboratory experiments of this phenomena have quantified the critical angles where Mach stems can form (Foster et al 2010;Yirak et al 2013), and the experiments agree reasonably well with the theoretical and numerical predictions.…”
Section: Narrow [S Ii] Filaments In the South Pillars Regionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…From the experimental data we measure the position and shape of the leading shock wave. We measure the radial position (r), defined as the distance from the axis of symmetry of the bow shock to its intersection with the cone directly from the radiographs (see Yirak et al 2013). Likewise, the length of the Mach stem is defined in the images as the distance from the location where the Mach stem intersects the surface of the cone to the triple point where the Mach stem, bow shock, and reflected shock meet.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we extend the laser experimental work of Foster et al (2010) to a platform where we control the intersection angle between a strong shock and a surface by constructing targets with shapes designed to (a) keep the intersection angle constant, (b) decrease the intersection angle suddenly to below the critical value, and then gradually increase it above that value and (c) compare shock propagation over smooth and rough surfaces. Initial results of the work were published by Yirak et al (2013). Here we compile all the data from two years of experiments at the Omega laser facility, and supplement the experimental data with a series of numerical simulations of intersecting shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the event of an incident shock wave producing a reflected shock from a solid boundary, there exists a critical angle φ c between the incident shock and the solid boundary, above which a fluid parcel cannot pass through both the incident and the reflected shocks while maintaining its original trajectory [49]. Once the critical angle is exceeded, the solution of the flow evolves into a new configuration consisting of an additional third shock which is normal to the solid boundary.…”
Section: D Mach Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a solid body, a Mach stem can be produced by the intersection of two co-moving bow shocks [49]. In such From the initial hot spots, detonation waves propagate outward towards each other, intersect and then continue propagating.…”
Section: D Mach Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%