2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Shock Waves Collide

Abstract: Supersonic outflows from objects as varied as stellar jets, massive stars and novae often exhibit multiple shock waves that overlap one another. When the intersection angle between two shock waves exceeds a critical value, the system reconfigures its geometry to create a normal shock known as a Mach stem where the shocks meet. Mach stems are important for interpreting emission-line images of shocked gas because a normal shock produces higher postshock temperatures and therefore a higher-excitation spectrum tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we have included a plot that shows how Mach stem size is affected by cooling strength. Our results confirm that the size of the Mach stem is always smaller than the cooling distance d cool , a conclusion consistent with predictions from Hartigan et al (2016).…”
Section: Mach Stem Formationsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we have included a plot that shows how Mach stem size is affected by cooling strength. Our results confirm that the size of the Mach stem is always smaller than the cooling distance d cool , a conclusion consistent with predictions from Hartigan et al (2016).…”
Section: Mach Stem Formationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, a more realistic approach would be to keep an ideal equation of state, leave γ at 5/3, and incorporate radiative cooling. We ran 2D models to explore how using cooling affects Mach stem formation and size, and their parameters are similar to other 2D Mach stem simulations from Hartigan et al (2016). These simulations are of two stationary clumps in a moving ambient,which creates intersecting bow shocks.…”
Section: Mach Stem Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). Each of these ejecta knots would produce bow shocks in the CSM gas, perhaps merging into a large scale shock when they overlap (Hartigan et al 2016). Although speculative, such a shock wave complex might help to explain the high [O III]/Hα ratio for position E3, but this would require far more ejecta knots than visible in the HST images.…”
Section: Photoionization Of Surrounding Nebulaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, most of the work that has been done thus far is on shock waves using shock tubes (Perry and Kantrowitz, 1951), exploding wires (Fedotov et al, 2007) or micro explosives (Hosseini and Takayama, 2005). Another method to study colliding shock waves experimentally has been used by Hartigan et al (2016) where they sent a curved shock in a cylinder of low-density foam using laser. It is worth mentioning that experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of multiple charges using conventional explosives is scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%