2004
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.80050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macaques infected long-term with attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac) remain resistant to wild-type challenge, despite declining cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to an immunodominant epitope

Abstract: To further investigate mechanisms of protective immunity that are induced by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), three macaques were infected with SIVmacGX2, a nef-disrupted molecular clone. In two of these animals, which expressed the MamuA*01 major histocompatibility complex class I allele, loss of functional activity against an SIV-Gag-encoded immunodominant cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope was observed following prolonged infection. Nonetheless, all three animals were resistant to cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies with EIAV, like those with SIV, have failed to establish a correlation between neutralizing antibody development and vaccine protection (14,16,23,25,51,52). While a range of studies have shown that passive immunization with neutralizing antibodies can protect against HIV or SHIV challenge (40,41,59), there have been other studies demonstrating that passively administered immune serum cannot protect animals from SIV infection (2,47,51,52,64). When the neutralizing antibody titers of the 24 vaccinated ponies were measured against the homologous Env strain, EV0, only 8 ponies had detectable neutralization titers at DOC, but these responses could not be correlated with vaccine protection from disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies with EIAV, like those with SIV, have failed to establish a correlation between neutralizing antibody development and vaccine protection (14,16,23,25,51,52). While a range of studies have shown that passive immunization with neutralizing antibodies can protect against HIV or SHIV challenge (40,41,59), there have been other studies demonstrating that passively administered immune serum cannot protect animals from SIV infection (2,47,51,52,64). When the neutralizing antibody titers of the 24 vaccinated ponies were measured against the homologous Env strain, EV0, only 8 ponies had detectable neutralization titers at DOC, but these responses could not be correlated with vaccine protection from disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If cell-mediated immune responses are the mechanism of protection in live attenuated SIV vaccinees, then a characteristic expansion of memory CD8 ϩ CTL and immune activation should be detected following virus challenge (17,19). Yet evidence for immune activation or expansion of SIV-specific CTL responses following rechallenge has not been reported (44,50). Even where protection against superinfection is incomplete, vaccine-mediated control of virus replication occurs before detection or expansion of CD8 ϩ SIV-specific CTL responses (1,51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an inverse correlation has been reported between the precursor frequency of SIV-specific CD8 ϩ CTL responses elicited by certain vaccine approaches and virus load following challenge (20,55). Although several groups have reported a correlation between SIV-specific CD8 ϩ CTL responses in live attenuated SIV vaccinees and protection against superinfection with wild-type SIV (24)(25)(26)56), other groups have failed to corroborate such observations and dispute a role for SIVspecific CD8 ϩ CTL in mediating protection (1,32,44,50,52).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prime-boost SIV vaccine regimens with plasmid DNA and viral vectors induce robust anamnestic T-cell responses following pathogenic SIVmac challenge, including cytotoxic T lymphocytes, although control of viral replication is inconsistent (15,22,32,53). However, monkeys vaccinated with live, attenuated SIV do not produce a strong anamnestic T-cell response following pathogenic-virus challenge (1,25,40,48). There are three nonexclusive mechanisms that could account for the difference in the vaccine-induced T-cell responses in monkeys vaccinated with live, attenuated SIV or SHIV and those vaccinated with prime-boost strategies.…”
Section: Cd8mentioning
confidence: 99%